UMIN試験ID | UMIN000018189 |
---|---|
受付番号 | R000021062 |
科学的試験名 | プロトコル登録の遵守率の系統的レビューのメタ疫学研究 |
一般公開日(本登録希望日) | 2015/07/07 |
最終更新日 | 2017/02/28 23:38:06 |
日本語
プロトコル登録の遵守率の系統的レビューのメタ疫学研究
英語
Adherence to protocol registration of systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: meta-epidemiological study
日本語
プロトコル登録の遵守率の系統的レビューのメタ疫学研究
英語
Adherence to protocol registration of systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: meta-epidemiological study
日本語
プロトコル登録の遵守率の系統的レビューのメタ疫学研究
英語
Adherence to protocol registration of systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: meta-epidemiological study
日本語
プロトコル登録の遵守率の系統的レビューのメタ疫学研究
英語
Adherence to protocol registration of systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: meta-epidemiological study
日本/Japan |
日本語
[Criteria for considering studies for this review]
We will include any systematic reviews or meta-analysis for interventions. Studies will be excluded if the reviews are for diagnostic test accuracy, non-randomized studies or meta-epidemiology. Eligibility will be assessed by two authors (H.T and Y.T.) independently. Differences regarding eligibility will be resolved by consensus and with the help of the senior author (Y.K.).
[Data collection and analysis]
[Selection of studies]
We will start with the review of titles of the articles identified in the initial research and proceed to review of abstracts, whose titles might be of relevance, and finally identify eligible studies on the basis of their full text.
英語
[Criteria for considering studies for this review]
We will include any systematic reviews or meta-analysis for interventions. Studies will be excluded if the reviews are for diagnostic test accuracy, non-randomized studies or meta-epidemiology. Eligibility will be assessed by two authors (H.T and Y.T.) independently. Differences regarding eligibility will be resolved by consensus and with the help of the senior author (Y.K.).
[Data collection and analysis]
[Selection of studies]
We will start with the review of titles of the articles identified in the initial research and proceed to review of abstracts, whose titles might be of relevance, and finally identify eligible studies on the basis of their full text.
該当せず/Not applicable |
悪性腫瘍/Malignancy
いいえ/NO
日本語
[Review question]
This review will be performed to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews in high-impact-factor journals. We will investigate adherence to protocol registration of the reviews.
英語
[Review question]
This review will be performed to evaluate the quality of systematic reviews in high-impact-factor journals. We will investigate adherence to protocol registration of the reviews.
その他/Others
日本語
[Rationale]
Thanks to dissemination of method of systematic reviews, anyone can tackle systematic reviews. There are abundant of systematic reviews for healthcare intervention, and there are duplication or overlap of reviews. Duplication of reviews may lead alpha error.
In addition, drug company come to use systematic reviews of the effects of their product as marketing tools because clinicians put much values on systematic reviews. However, there are concerns of publication bias or selective outcome reporting of systematic reviews.
Protocol registration was disseminated as the PRISMSA statement in 2009 to avoid duplication and publication bias. In order to detect potential alpha error or selective outcome reporting, we will investigate adherence to protocol registration.
英語
[Rationale]
Thanks to dissemination of method of systematic reviews, anyone can tackle systematic reviews. There are abundant of systematic reviews for healthcare intervention, and there are duplication or overlap of reviews. Duplication of reviews may lead alpha error.
In addition, drug company come to use systematic reviews of the effects of their product as marketing tools because clinicians put much values on systematic reviews. However, there are concerns of publication bias or selective outcome reporting of systematic reviews.
Protocol registration was disseminated as the PRISMSA statement in 2009 to avoid duplication and publication bias. In order to detect potential alpha error or selective outcome reporting, we will investigate adherence to protocol registration.
日本語
[Primary Outcome]
Adherence to protocol registration
英語
[Primary Outcome]
Adherence to protocol registration
日本語
[Secondary Outcome]
1. Number of systematic reviews that refer directly to PRISMA statement
2. Adherence to protocol registration among systematic reviews that refer directly to the PRISMA statement
3. Publication bias in each registered and unregistered systematic reviews
英語
[Secondary Outcome]
1. Number of systematic reviews that refer directly to PRISMA statement
2. Adherence to protocol registration among systematic reviews that refer directly to the PRISMA statement
3. Publication bias in each registered and unregistered systematic reviews
その他・メタアナリシス等/Others,meta-analysis etc
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
適用なし/Not applicable |
適用なし/Not applicable |
男女両方/Male and Female
日本語
[inclusion criteria]
the Journal Citation Reports 2013 のgeneral internal medicineでtop 10 journalsに掲載されたシステマテックレビュー
[Data extraction and management]
Two authors (H.T. and Y.T.) will review titles and abstracts identified by the searches independently. They will independently detect protocol registration information from abstract or full text if needed. In addition, each author will check reference of the PRISMA statement.. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus and with the help of the senior investigator (Y.K.).
[Searches]
[Search method]
We will select the 10 journals classified by the Journal Citation Reports 2013 as general internal medicine journal associated with the highest impact factors; we will exclude the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews because protocol registration is strictly performed in articles published in the database. We will search MEDLINE (source, PubMed, between August 1st 2009 and June 30th 2015) using the journal names and "Search Strategy Used to Create the Systematic Reviews Subset on PubMed" last modified February 2015; the search will be not subject to language restrictions. We will select systematic reviews for any randomized intervention. We will exclude systematic reviews for diagnostic test accuracy and systematic reviews for non-randomized observational studies
英語
[inclusion criteria]
the 10 journals classified by the Journal Citation Reports 2013 as general internal medicine journal associated with the highest impact factors
[Data extraction and management]
Two authors (H.T. and Y.T.) will review titles and abstracts identified by the searches independently. They will independently detect protocol registration information from abstract or full text if needed. In addition, each author will check reference of the PRISMA statement.. Disagreements will be resolved by consensus and with the help of the senior investigator (Y.K.).
[Searches]
[Search method]
We will select the 10 journals classified by the Journal Citation Reports 2013 as general internal medicine journal associated with the highest impact factors; we will exclude the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews because protocol registration is strictly performed in articles published in the database. We will search MEDLINE (source, PubMed, between August 1st 2009 and June 30th 2015) using the journal names and "Search Strategy Used to Create the Systematic Reviews Subset on PubMed" last modified February 2015; the search will be not subject to language restrictions. We will select systematic reviews for any randomized intervention. We will exclude systematic reviews for diagnostic test accuracy and systematic reviews for non-randomized observational studies
日本語
the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
英語
the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
1
日本語
名 | |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 辻本 啓 |
英語
名 | |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | TSUJIMOTO Hiraku |
日本語
兵庫県立尼崎総合医療センター
英語
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
日本語
臨床研究推進ユニット
英語
Hospital Care Research Unit
日本語
兵庫県尼崎市東難波二丁目17番77号
英語
Higashinaniwa 2-17-77, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
+816-6480-7000
hira.to.ber3598@gmail.com
日本語
名 | |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | 辻本 啓 |
英語
名 | |
ミドルネーム | |
姓 | TSUJIMOTO Hiraku |
日本語
兵庫県立尼崎総合医療センター
英語
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
日本語
臨床研究推進ユニット
英語
Hospital Care Research Unit
日本語
兵庫県尼崎市東難波二丁目17番77号
英語
Higashinaniwa 2-17-77, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
+816-6480-7000
hira.to.ber3598@gmail.com
日本語
その他
英語
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
日本語
兵庫県立尼崎総合医療センター
日本語
日本語
英語
日本語
その他
英語
Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
日本語
兵庫県立尼崎総合医療センター
日本語
地方自治体/Local Government
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
いいえ/NO
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
2015 | 年 | 07 | 月 | 07 | 日 |
最終結果が公表されている/Published
http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(17)30181-6/pdf
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
日本語
英語
試験終了/Completed
2015 | 年 | 07 | 月 | 06 | 日 |
2015 | 年 | 07 | 月 | 07 | 日 |
日本語
[Analysis]
[Strategy for data synthesis]
First, we examined rate of systematic reviews that refer directly to protocol registration among all the identified reviews.
Second, we examined adherence rate of protocol registration among systematic reviews that refer directly to the PRISMA statement.
Finally, we plot estimates of study findings (the log odds ratio) against their standard error in order to investigate publication bias in each registered or unregistered systematic reviews.
In addition, the Egger test will be used to examine publication bias.
[Analysis of subgroups or subsets]
To identify factors associated with the adherences to protocol registration, we will examine the following a priori defined possible predictors using univariate analysis: year of publication, sources of trial funding, journal, journal impact factor, region in which the study was led, sample size and citation of the PRISMA statement. The important factors strongly associated with protocol registration (P< 0.2, by univariate analysis) will be further analyzed by logistic regression.
英語
[Analysis]
[Strategy for data synthesis]
First, we examined rate of systematic reviews that refer directly to protocol registration among all the identified reviews.
Second, we examined adherence rate of protocol registration among systematic reviews that refer directly to the PRISMA statement.
Finally, we plot estimates of study findings (the log odds ratio) against their standard error in order to investigate publication bias in each registered or unregistered systematic reviews.
In addition, the Egger test will be used to examine publication bias.
[Analysis of subgroups or subsets]
To identify factors associated with the adherences to protocol registration, we will examine the following a priori defined possible predictors using univariate analysis: year of publication, sources of trial funding, journal, journal impact factor, region in which the study was led, sample size and citation of the PRISMA statement. The important factors strongly associated with protocol registration (P< 0.2, by univariate analysis) will be further analyzed by logistic regression.
2015 | 年 | 07 | 月 | 04 | 日 |
2017 | 年 | 02 | 月 | 28 | 日 |
日本語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021062
英語
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021062
研究計画書 | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |
研究症例データ仕様書 | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |
研究症例データ | |
---|---|
登録日時 | ファイル名 |