Unique ID issued by UMIN | C000000353 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000000452 |
Scientific Title | Effectiveness of two screening methods for domestic violence in the prenatal setting: A randomised controlled trial |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2006/03/31 |
Last modified on | 2006/03/09 00:38:23 |
Effectiveness of two screening methods for domestic violence in the prenatal setting: A randomised controlled trial
Effectiveness of two screening methods for domestic violence in the prenatal setting: A randomised controlled trial
Effectiveness of two screening methods for domestic violence in the prenatal setting: A randomised controlled trial
Effectiveness of two screening methods for domestic violence in the prenatal setting: A randomised controlled trial
Japan |
Domestic violence against women
Nursing |
Others
NO
To compare the effectiveness of a face-to-face interview with a self-administered questionnaire for identifying women who are being abused
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
Identification rate of DV
Comfort level for screening for DV
Consulting with a nurse
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
YES
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
Face-to-face interview by nurses
Self-administered questionnaire
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Female
Less than 25 weeks pregnancy
Had any serious mental diseases
Not Japanese speaker
If their partner would not agree to leave the room during the interview or completing questionnaire
280
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yaeko Kataoka |
St. Luke's College of Nursing
Research Center for Development of Nursing Practice
10-1 Akashi-cho Chuo-ku Tokyo
03-6226-6380
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yaeko Kataoka |
St. Luke's College of Nursing
Research Center for Development of Nursing Practice
10-1 Akashi-cho Chuo-ku Tokyo
03-6226-6380
yaeko-kataoka@slcn.ac.jp
St. Luke's College of Nursing
Grant-in-Aid for COE Research
Japan
NO
2006 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
Unpublished
For the interview group the identification rate was 32/165 (19.4%) compared with 48/163 (29.4%) in the questionnaire group, which was much higher (relative risk 0.66, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.97).
Completed
2002 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2003 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2003 | Year | 05 | Month | 01 | Day |
2003 | Year | 05 | Month | 01 | Day |
2003 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2004 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
2006 | Year | 03 | Month | 09 | Day |
2006 | Year | 03 | Month | 09 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000000452
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |