UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000001059
Receipt number R000001285
Scientific Title A prospective, multicentre, observational trial for hemodynamic reaction following initial fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock due to blunt trauma
Date of disclosure of the study information 2008/03/07
Last modified on 2008/08/08 17:17:29

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A prospective, multicentre, observational trial for hemodynamic reaction following initial fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock due to blunt trauma

Acronym

Hemodynamic reaction following initial fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock

Scientific Title

A prospective, multicentre, observational trial for hemodynamic reaction following initial fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock due to blunt trauma

Scientific Title:Acronym

Hemodynamic reaction following initial fluid resuscitation in patients with hemorrhagic shock

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock

Classification by specialty

Emergency medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Japan Advanced Trauma Evaluation and Care (JATEC) and Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) suggest that, in patients with hemorrhagic shock, the response and the treatment policy for initial fluid resuscitation should be categorized into three groups: 1) responder; 2) transient responder; and 3) non-responder. Hemorrhagic shock is comprehensively diagnosed based on several clinical findings, such as skin color, pulse rate, blood pressure, consciousness levels, etc. However, the diagnosis varies depending on clinical experiences of each physician and/or each ER system. For clinically investigating hemorrhagic shock, an evidence-based objective index for the shock is necessary. Research results and scientific literature that have been reported in the past used systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR as standard criteria for evaluation of the shock. However, the rationale for setting BP and HR for criteria of the categorization of hemorrhagic shock, still remain uncertain.
This study aims to 1) define (levels of) hemorrhagic shock using BP, HR, and transfused volume, and 2) determine treatment policy based on response to initial fluid resuscitation using the results of 1), and 3) determine whether the coagulation function and lactic acid value at admission can be used to categorize the shock into responder, transient responder, or non-responder.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

1) Character of patients with hemorrhagic shock
2) Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) on admission
3) SBP and HR at the time when 1L of fluid replacement was administered.
4) SBP and HR at the time when 2L was administered.
5) SBP and HR at the time when the management of ER was finished.
6) Total volume of fluid replacement and blood transfusion at ER
7) Total volume of fluid replacement and blood transfusion during 24 hr
8) Details of interventional treatment performed for hemorrhage

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

16 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

(1) Patients who received initial fluid resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock
(2) Patients with physiological abnormality (Step 1), anatomical abnormality (Step 2), or mechanism of injury (high-energy injuries: Step 3) defined by JATEC (guideline p233).
Patients who meet criteria for 1 or 2 above.

Key exclusion criteria

(1) Penetrating trauma
(2) When the physician selected permissive hypotension therapy
(3) Cardiopulmonary arrest
(4) Patients whose fluid therapy started before admission
(5) Patients with terminal stage of chronic disease
(6) When the physician consider that the initial fluid resuscitation therapy is inappropriate for the patient (state the specific reason)

Target sample size

100


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Akio Kimura

Organization

International Medical Center of Japan, Tokyo, Japan

Division name

Department of Emergency Medicine and Traumatology and Toxicology

Zip code


Address

1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8655 Japan

TEL

03-3202-7181

Email



Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Akiyoshi Hagiwara

Organization

National Defense Medical College, Japan

Division name

Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine

Zip code


Address

3-2 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-8513 Japan

TEL

04-2995-1511

Homepage URL


Email

boeihagi@ndmc.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

The General Planning Committee of Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

The Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Non profit foundation

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2008 Year 03 Month 07 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2007 Year 12 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2007 Year 12 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2008 Year 07 Month 01 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2008 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2008 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Date analysis concluded

2008 Year 12 Month 01 Day


Other

Other related information

A prospective, multicentre, observational trial


Management information

Registered date

2008 Year 02 Month 29 Day

Last modified on

2008 Year 08 Month 08 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000001285


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name