Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000001400 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000001701 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of maximal sterile barrier precautions with standard sterile barrier precautions on catheter-related blood stream infection: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2008/09/27 |
Last modified on | 2015/04/06 12:28:59 |
Comparison of maximal sterile barrier precautions with standard sterile barrier precautions on catheter-related blood stream infection: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial.
maximal precaution trial
Comparison of maximal sterile barrier precautions with standard sterile barrier precautions on catheter-related blood stream infection: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial.
maximal precaution trial
Japan |
Patients who were admitted in the general surgical wards and were planned to be inserted non-tunneled CVC.
Surgery in general |
Malignancy
NO
To investigate whether institution of maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBP) during central venous catheter (CVC) insertion prevents catheter-related blood stream infection comparing to standard sterile barrier precautions (SSBP) in the surgical wards
Efficacy
catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI)
catheter-related infection (CRI)
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
maximal sterile barrier precautions (MSBP)
standard sterile barrier precautions (SSBP)
19 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patients who were admitted into the general surgical wards and were planed to be inserted a non-tunnel type CVC.
(1) Patients under 18 years old
(2) Patients who had a temparature 0f 38.1 degree centigrade or above.
(3) Patients who had already been administered antibiotics before CVC insertion.
(4) Patients who were inserted CVC as a replacement.
(5) Patients who were in the ICU.
400
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yoshio Haga |
National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center
Department of Surgery
1-5Ninomaru, Kumamoto, Japan
096-353-6501
yoshio@kumamed.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yoshio Haga |
National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center
Department of Surgery
1-5Ninomaru, Kumamoto, Japan
096-353-6501
yoshio@kumamed.jp
National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center
Health Science Research Grants for Research on Medical Technology Assessment and Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health, from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.
Japan
NO
2008 | Year | 09 | Month | 27 | Day |
Published
http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2010/04000/Maximal_Sterile_Barrier_Precautions_Do_Not_Reduce.7.aspx
424 patients scheduled for CVC insertion in surgical units at nine medical centers in Japan were randomly assigned to either an MSBP group (n=211) or a standard sterile barrier precaution (SSBP) group (n=213). The median (range) duration of catheterization was 14 days (0 to 92 days) in the MSBP group and 14 days (0 to 112 days) in the SSBP group. There were 5 cases (2.4%) of CRBSI in the MSBP group and 6 cases (2.8%) in the SSBP group (relative risk [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 2.7; P=0.77). The rate of CRBSIs per 1000 catheter days was 1.5 in the MSBP group and 1.6 in the SSBP group. There were 8 cases (3.8%) of catheter-related infections (CRIs) in the MSBP group and 7 cases (3.3%) in the SSBP group (RR, 1.2; 95%CI, 0.43 to 3.1; P=0.78). The rate of CRI per 1000 catheter days was 2.4 in the MSBP group and 1.9 in the SSBP group. This study is larger in sample size than the one performed by Raad et al and could not demonstrate better prevention of CRBSIs by MSBP compared with SSBP. A large RCT or at least a meta-analysis of any other studies in the literature is necessary to reach a conclusion on this issue.
Completed
2004 | Year | 07 | Month | 22 | Day |
2004 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
2006 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2006 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
2008 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
2008 | Year | 09 | Month | 01 | Day |
This study was reported in Annals of Surgery.
Ann Surg, 2010;251(4): 620–623.
2008 | Year | 09 | Month | 27 | Day |
2015 | Year | 04 | Month | 06 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000001701
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |