Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000002833 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000003458 |
Scientific Title | Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of oral Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast): Clinical study |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2009/12/03 |
Last modified on | 2009/12/03 01:32:01 |
Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of oral Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast): Clinical study
Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of oral Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast): Clinical study
Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of oral Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast): Clinical study
Ocular Hypotensive Efficacy and Safety of oral Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast): Clinical study
Europe |
GLAUCOMA
Ophthalmology |
Others
NO
Evaluate the role of Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) to reduce Intraocular Pressure value in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).
Safety,Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Evaluate the role of Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) to reduce Intraocular Pressure value in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).
Evaluate visual acuity, visual fields, vital signs and psycotropic effects.
Interventional
Cross-over
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
Placebo
NO
NO
Institution is considered as a block.
NO
No need to know
2
Treatment
Food |
Palmytoilethanolamide (Visimast) oral admistration 300mg twice daily./ At baseline and the following examinations the following parameters were evaluated: best corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopic and slit-lamp and dilated funduscopic examinations with evaluation of vertical and horizontal cup-dik ratio, measurement of IOP. Centracorneal tickness measurement and visual field test were performed at the beginning and at the end of the two periods ofthe two periods of the study.
Placebo oral administration twice daily./
At baseline and the following examinations the following parameters were evaluated: best corrected visual acuity, biomicroscopic and slit-lamp and dilated funduscopic examinations with evaluation of vertical and horizontal cup-dik ratio, measurement of IOP. Centracorneal tickness measurement and visual field test were performed at the beginning and at the end of the two periods ofthe two periods of the study.
18 | years-old | <= |
70 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. Patients aged 18-70 years, affected by primary open angle glaucoma with ocular hypertension under control with hypotonic drug (<18mmHg).
2. Visual field defects and optic disc cupping for at least one year (with at least 2 following exams).
3. All patients should be able to perform a reliable visual field (a minimum of 5 tests).
1. Advanced stage glaucoma
2. Smokers
3. No tolerability to product under evaluation
4. Needs of glaucoma surgical or laser therapy
5. Ocular surgery in the last year
6. Visual acuity lower < 8/10 with refractive error > 3 diopters
7. Pupillary diameter < 2.5mm
8. Concomitant systemic or ocular pathologies
9. Pregnant or lactation
10. Vasoactive systemic therapies (Ca- antagonistis, oral betablokers, others)
11 Partecipation to other trials
42
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | CATERINA GAGLIANO |
UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA
OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPERTMENT
VIA G. CLEMENTI 36
3472698035
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | CATERINA GAGLIANO |
UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA
OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPERTMENT
VIA G. CLEMENTI 36
3472698035
caterina_gagliano@hotmail.com
UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA
PUBLIC
Self funding
Italy
NO
2009 | Year | 12 | Month | 03 | Day |
Partially published
The cannabimimetic agent PEA orally administered (300 mg tablets-Visimast) twice daily was able to significantly reduce IOP after 1 month as well as 2 month therapy in primary open angle glaucoma patients which were under topical anti-hypertensive drug treatment.
Completed
2008 | Year | 10 | Month | 10 | Day |
2008 | Year | 11 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2009 | Year | 08 | Month | 01 | Day |
the PEA was well tolereted and safe. No side effects were reported in PEA treatment group.
2009 | Year | 12 | Month | 03 | Day |
2009 | Year | 12 | Month | 03 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000003458
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |