UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000003832
Receipt number R000004620
Scientific Title A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2010/06/28
Last modified on 2010/06/28 14:58:33

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Acronym

The effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on unilateral spatial neglect

Scientific Title

A randomized controlled trial about the effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Scientific Title:Acronym

The effectiveness of prism adaptation therapy on unilateral spatial neglect

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Patients with left unilateral spatial neglect caused by cerebral stroke

Classification by specialty

Cardiology Neurology Rehabilitation medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN) is defined as a failure to report, respond, or orient to novel or meaningful stimuli, presented to the side opposite to the brain lesion. The most important clinical problem of USN is that it can interfere with the rehabilitation processes and cause poor functional outcome. Various rehabilitation techniques are explored for USN.
Rossetti and collegues reported, for the first time, that short term adaptation for rightward optical shift induced with prismatic lenses improved performance on various standard tests of left USN. Long-term effects (as long as 5 weeks) were also reported following an intensive twice-daily adaptation program for 2 weeks. However, there has been no randomized controlled trial (RCT) with sufficient sample size examining the effects of PA, and few studies are available demonstrating improvement not only in neuropsychological examinations but also in activities of daily living (ADL) with PA.
If greater efficacy of rehabilitation can be brought about by intervening USN early in the rehabilitation process, patients with USN might achieve higher ADL goals.
The purpose of this RCT is to test if PA improves functional outcomes for stroke patients with USN in the subacute stage.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Phase III


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Behavioral inattention test (BIT), Catherine Bergego scale (CBS)
Time of assessment:at admission, just after intervention, at discharge

Key secondary outcomes

Motor score of stroke impairment assessment set (SIAS), Functional independence measure (FIM)
Time of assessment:at admission, just after intervention, at discharge


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Double blind -all involved are blinded

Control

Placebo

Stratification

YES

Dynamic allocation

YES

Institution consideration

Institution is considered as adjustment factor in dynamic allocation.

Blocking

NO

Concealment

Numbered container method


Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment Maneuver

Interventions/Control_1

Patients were seated at a desk on which a wooden table (height 30 cm) was placed. The top of the table had a semicircular shape with a radius of 30 cm, and three targets were marked at the center, right and left corners of its edge. Patients were asked to point to the three targets through the bottom of the table with their index finger according to the instruction of the therapists who directed three points randomly to the patients. First, they repeated the pointing task thirty times without prism glasses. Then they wore prism glasses which sifted their visual field 12 degrees to the right, and repeated pointing ninety times. After the prism adaptation, they took the prism glasses off and repeated pointing sixty times. Patients underwent two daily training sessions which took about 20 minutes for each, 5 days a week for 2 weeks, giving a total of 20 sessions.
The interventions occurred during their regularly scheduled rehabilitation sessions and all other routine interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation was provided as usual.

Interventions/Control_2

Patients of the control group underwent the same training sessions with neutral plastic glasses instead of the prisms glasses.
The interventions occurred during their regularly scheduled rehabilitation sessions and all other routine interdisciplinary stroke rehabilitation was provided as usual.

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

41 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

89 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

(1) first ever hemiparetic stroke,
(2) admission within 3 months after the stroke onset,
(3) right hemisphere damage
(4)no severe cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination: MMSE>15
(5) at least one item scoring less than the cut off value in the standard test of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT).

Key exclusion criteria

(1)unable to sit on a wheelchair
(2)unable to understand the task because of aphasia or other cognitive impairment, (3) unable to understand Japanese
(4) extremely decreased eyesight
(5) severe hearing loss
(6) unable to reach with the right upper extremity because of restricted range of motion
(7) right upper extremity amputation more proximal to half of the forearm
(8) severe position sense deficits of the right fingers because of peripheral neuropathy, etc.
(9) past medical history of head trauma or ventriculoperitoneal shunt
(10) patients' refusal for participation.

Target sample size

50


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Katsuhiro Mizuno

Organization

Keio University School of Medicine

Division name

Departnment of Rehabilitation Medicine

Zip code


Address

35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-5363-3833

Email



Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Katsuhiro Mizuno

Organization

Keio University School of Medicine

Division name

Departnment of Rehabilitation Medicine

Zip code


Address

35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-5363-3833

Homepage URL


Email

mizuno.katsuhiro@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Keio University School of Medicine

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Tokyo Metropolitan Rehabilitation Hospital

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Non profit foundation

Nationality of Funding Organization

JAPAN


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

東京都リハビリテーション病院(東京都)、市川市リハビリテーション病院(千葉県)、慶應義塾大学月が瀬リハビリテーションセンター(静岡県)、輝山会記念病院(長野県)、国立病院機構村山医療センター(東京都)、辻村病院(愛知県)、稲城市立病院(東京都)、旭川リハビリテーション病院(北海道)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2010 Year 06 Month 28 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2005 Year 04 Month 28 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2005 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2007 Year 07 Month 01 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2008 Year 01 Month 01 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2008 Year 03 Month 01 Day

Date analysis concluded

2009 Year 03 Month 01 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2010 Year 06 Month 28 Day

Last modified on

2010 Year 06 Month 28 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000004620


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name