UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000005363
Receipt number R000006364
Scientific Title Clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction
Date of disclosure of the study information 2011/04/01
Last modified on 2013/03/01 14:57:07

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction

Acronym

Clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction

Scientific Title

Clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction

Scientific Title:Acronym

Clinical dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

biliary tract cancer or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction

Classification by specialty

Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine Hematology and clinical oncology Hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The aim is to determine the optimal dose of gemcitabine in patients with biliary tract or pancreatic cancer with liver dysfunction. In addition, we measure plasma concentrations of unchanged gemcitabine and its metabolism (2'-deoxy-2',2' difluorouridine: dFdU) using high-performance liquid chromatography, and we consider the pharmacokinetics.

Basic objectives2

Safety

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Phase I


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Performance status, hematologic toxicity, and non-hematological toxicity during the first course of gemcitabine

Key secondary outcomes

Pharmacokinetics


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Uncontrolled

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

3

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

Patients are classified into three groups ; mild, moderate or severe liver dysfunction. Determination of the optimal dose for each group.
1) Mild dysfunction;
Group1 Total bilirubin =<ULN,
AST/ALT>ULN
Group2 Total bilirubin >1.0x to 1.5x
ULN, AST/ALT Any
2) Level1;1000mg/m2
3) blood samples (8 points) are collected bofore and after the first administration of gemcitabine to consider its pharmacokinetics

Interventions/Control_2

1) Moderate dysfunction;
Total bilirubin >1.5x to 3.0x ULN,
AST/ALT Any
2) Level1;800mg/m2, Level2;1000mg/m2
3) blood samples (8 points) are collected bofore and after the first administration of gemcitabine to consider its pharmacokinetics

Interventions/Control_3

1) Severe dysfunction;
Total bilirubin >3.0x to 10x ULN,
AST/ALT Any
2) Level1;800mg/m2, Level2;1000mg/m2
Level-1;650mg/m2
3) blood samples (8 points) are collected bofore and after the first administration of gemcitabine to consider its pharmacokinetics

Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1) Cytologically or histologically diagnosed biliary tract or pancreatic cancer
2) planned to receive gemcitabine monotherapy (including adjuvant chemotherapy)
3) Patients with liver dysfunction
4) Patients over 20 years old at the time of obtaining informed consent
5) Performance status 0-2 in classification of mild or moderate liver dysfunction
Performance status 0,1 in classification of severe liver dysfunction
6) Patients with adequate bone marrow functions
neutrophil count >= 1,500/uL
platelet count >= 10,0000/uL
hemoglobin >= 9.0g/dL
7) Patients received a sufficient explanation for this study and agreed
8) does not ask whether the patients have the mesurable lesion
9) If the patient underwent biliary drainage,the patient met the above criteria can be incorporated

Key exclusion criteria

1) Patients have received in the past gemcitabine hydrochloride monotherapy
2) Total bilirubin >10x ULN
3) Serum creatinin >1.5x ULN
4) Performance status 2 in classification of severe liver dysfunction
5) patients with interstitial pneumonia or pulmonary fibrosis on chest X-ray and having clinical symptoms
6) Patients with infections requiring treatment
7) Patients with uncontrolled diabetes despite the enforcement of appropriate drug therapy (including insulin)
8) it is clear that patients with constitutional jaundice
9) HBc antibody, HCV antibody, HIV antibody or syphilis positive
10) In addition, patients were judged inappropriate to participate in the clinical trial

Target sample size

30


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yuichi Ando

Organization

Nagoya university hospital

Division name

Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy

Zip code


Address

65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi,Aichi, Japan

TEL


Email



Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Takashi Shibata

Organization

Nagoya university hospital

Division name

Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy

Zip code


Address


TEL


Homepage URL


Email

tshibata@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Nagoya university hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

Nagoya university, Department of Surgical Oncology
Saitama medical university, Department of Clinical Oncology

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

名古屋大学医学部附属病院


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2011 Year 04 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Open public recruiting

Date of protocol fixation

2011 Year 02 Month 24 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2011 Year 03 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2015 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2011 Year 04 Month 01 Day

Last modified on

2013 Year 03 Month 01 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000006364


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name