Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000005881 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000006944 |
Scientific Title | Phase II study of gemcitabine and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2011/07/01 |
Last modified on | 2016/01/04 09:24:45 |
Phase II study of gemcitabine and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer
SBP-01
Phase II study of gemcitabine and trastuzumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer
SBP-01
Japan |
Metastatic breast cancer
Hematology and clinical oncology | Breast surgery |
Malignancy
NO
To evaluate efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus trastuzumab in chemotherapy and trastuzumab-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Safety,Efficacy
Exploratory
Phase II
Objective response rate
Progression free survival, Overall survival, Adverse events rate
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Uncontrolled
1
Treatment
Medicine |
Combination treatment of gemcitabine and trastuzumab
gemcitabine 1250mg/m2 day1,8 21days cycle
trastuzumab 2mg/kg (Initial dose 4mg/kg) q1w
continuing treatment until disease progression
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Female
1) Signed written informed consent
2) Age over 20 years.
3) ECOG performance Status 0-2
4) Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast
5) HER2-positive in the tissue of primary breast cancer or metastatic sites.
6) Patients must have measurable disease that is evaluable according to RECIST 1.1
7) LVEF over 50% at baseline
8) Adequate organ function
9) Prior combination treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy
10) Expectation of more than 3 months survival
1) Active double cancer
2) Brain metastases that requiring treatment at registration
3) Unstable angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication within 6 months to registration
4) Uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes mellitus.
5) Active infection disease
6) Other severe, uncontrolled systemic disease
7) Over grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction to trastuzumab
8) Hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, or biological treatment <7days prior to registration
9) Radiation therapy <14days prior to registration
10) Prior gemcitabine therapy
11) Current pregnancy and lactation
12) Assessment by the investigator to be unsuitable to comply with the requirements of the protocol
42
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Fumikata Hara |
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Department of medical oncology
160 Minami Umemoto Ko, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan 7910280
089-999-1111
hfumikat@shikoku-cc.go.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Naruto Taira |
Setouchi Breast Project Comprehensive Organization
Clinical Research Group
2-5-1 Shikata Kita-ku Okayama Okayama Japan, 7008558
086-235-7265
info@setouchi-bp.com
Setouchi Breast Project Comprehensive Organization
Setouchi Breast Project Comprehensive Organization
Other
NO
2011 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
Published
Background: There are few evidence on efficacy of Tmab-containing regimens after disease progression. Gemcitabine (GEM) is non-cross resistant to anthracycline and taxane. Preclinical studies have shown that the combination of Tmab and GEM has synergistic effect against HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. SBP-01 study assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of Tamb and GEM in patients with HER2-positive MBC previously treated with anti-HER2 therapy. Methods: SBP-01 study included patients treated with one or more anti-HER2 directed regimens for MBC. Patients were administered with GEM 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle and Tmab 4mg/kg loading dose and then 2mg/kg weekly. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. Results: Between June 2011 and June 2014, 35 patients were enrolled. Patients had ER positive tumor (37.1%), a median of 2 metastatic organ sites, visceral metastasis (80.0%), prior (neo) adjuvant Tmab (22.9%) and a median of 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Previous HER2-directed drugs included Tmab (94.3%), lapatinib (37.1%), T-DM1 (8.6%) and pertuzumab (2.9%). ORR was 22.9% (95% CI, 8.6%-36.8%). Median PFS was 146 days. Patients with stable disease response received a median of 7 cycles (6-28 cycles) of treatment. Grade3/4 leukopenia (20.0%) and neutropenia (48.6%) were observed. All non-hematological toxicities were less than grade3. Conclusions: The Combination Tmab and GEM is effective and well-tolerated regimen for patients previously treated with HER2-directed therapy, and appears to make disease stable for long time period.
Main results already published
2011 | Year | 06 | Month | 16 | Day |
2011 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2011 | Year | 06 | Month | 29 | Day |
2016 | Year | 01 | Month | 04 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000006944
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |