UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000006665
Receipt number R000007815
Scientific Title Diagnostic accuracy of low dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) based fecal tagging computed tomography colonography (CTC) for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test
Date of disclosure of the study information 2011/11/04
Last modified on 2016/11/07 16:42:12

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Diagnostic accuracy of low dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) based fecal tagging computed tomography colonography (CTC) for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test

Acronym

Diagnostic accuracy of low dose bowel preparation based fecal tagging CT colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia

Scientific Title

Diagnostic accuracy of low dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) based fecal tagging computed tomography colonography (CTC) for the detection of colorectal neoplasia in patients with positive fecal immunochemical test

Scientific Title:Acronym

Diagnostic accuracy of low dose bowel preparation based fecal tagging CT colonography for the detection of colorectal neoplasia

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

colorectal cancer, colorectal polyp

Classification by specialty

Gastroenterology Radiology Laboratory medicine

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To address the accuracy of CT colonography (CTC) in detecting colorectal polyps and cancers in subjects with positive fecal immunochemical test, using optical colonoscopy as the reference standard.

Basic objectives2

Bio-equivalence

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Low dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) based fecal tagging CTC vs. optical colonoscopy. Detection performance and accuracy of colorectal polyps (at least 6 mm in diameter) and colorectal cancer.

Key secondary outcomes

Comparative adherence of patients to CTC and optical colonoscopy.
Frequency and nature of any adverse events.


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Self control

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Prevention

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

CTC and optical colonoscopy

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

40 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1) fecal immunochemical test positive.
2) Major functions of organs of the subjects are in a good condition.
3) Aged 40 years or older.
4) Signed informed consent forms are obtained by the patients.

Key exclusion criteria

1) Known colorectal polyps or cancers at any site at the time of enrollment.
2) Patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
3) Fulfillment of clinical criteria for diagnosis of FAP or HNPCC (Amsterdam criteria).
4) Serious medical conditions that may increase the risk of optical colonoscopy or are so severe that screening would have no benefit.
5) Previous colorectal surgery.
6) Gastric or intestinal stenosis, abdominal adhesions, bowel obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon.
7) Evidence of an increased risk in carrying out bowel preparation or CTC exams.
8) Possibility of pregnancy.
9) Optical colonoscopy or barium enema carried out within the last 3 years.
10) Patients with psychological conditions that contraindicate colonoscopy or make them irrelevant to participate in the trial.
11) Claustrophobia.
12) Iodine hypersensitivity.
13) Severe thyroid disease.
14) Severe deafness.
15) Subjects whose eligibility for this clinical trial is not appropriate by other reasons.

Target sample size

300


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Hideharu Sugimoto MD, Kenichi Utano, MD, Koichi Nagata MD, Tetsuro Honda MD

Organization

Jichi Medical University

Division name

Department of Medical Division of Radiology and Gastroenterology

Zip code


Address

3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimono, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

TEL

0285-58-7362

Email

nagata7@aol.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Kenichi Utano, MD

Organization

Jichi Medical University

Division name

Department of Medical Division of Radiology

Zip code


Address

3311-1, Yakushiji, Shimono, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan

TEL

0285-58-7362

Homepage URL

http://www.jichi.ac.jp/radiol/

Email

jichirad-ctc@hotmail.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Department od Medical Division of Radiology, Jichi Medical University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor

1. Otaru Kyokai Hospital
2. Hokkaido Gastroenterology Hospital
3. Tonan Hospital
4. Kameda Medical Center Makuhari
5. Kameda General Hospital
6. Matsuda Hospital
7. Kamigoto Hospital

Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

北海道社会事業協会小樽病院(北海道)、北海道消化器科病院(北海道)、KKR札幌医療センター 斗南病院(北海道)、自治医科大学附属病院(栃木県)、亀田メディカルセンター幕張(千葉県)、亀田総合病院(千葉県)、松田病院(静岡県)、長崎県 上五島病院(長崎県)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2011 Year 11 Month 04 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2016160320

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Main results already published

Date of protocol fixation

2011 Year 10 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2011 Year 12 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2013 Year 03 Month 01 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2013 Year 03 Month 01 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2013 Year 03 Month 01 Day

Date analysis concluded

2013 Year 07 Month 01 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2011 Year 11 Month 03 Day

Last modified on

2016 Year 11 Month 07 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000007815


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name