UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000007949
Receipt number R000009364
Scientific Title Clinical study to detect sentinel lymph nodes for endometrial cancers
Date of disclosure of the study information 2012/05/14
Last modified on 2017/05/23 09:26:48

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Clinical study to detect sentinel lymph nodes for endometrial cancers

Acronym

Clinical study on sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancers

Scientific Title

Clinical study to detect sentinel lymph nodes for endometrial cancers

Scientific Title:Acronym

Clinical study on sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancers

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Endometrial cancer

Classification by specialty

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To calculate the detecting rate, sensitivity and false negative rate in sentinel node navigation system (SNNS) for endometrial cancer and to determine the validity of less-invasive surgery using SNNS with the aim of clinical application of SNNS.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

detecting rate, sensitivity and false negative rate, negative predective value, detecting rate of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells

Key secondary outcomes

learning curve of detecting rate and time needed for sentinel nodes, detecting rates and sentinel node distributions depending on detecting methods and injection sites of tracers, diagnostic accuracy of touch smear of sentinel lymph nodes, diagnostic accuracies of metastasis to lymph nodes in pre-operative PET-CT and sentinel lymph nodes.


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Uncontrolled

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Diagnosis

Type of intervention

Maneuver

Interventions/Control_1

One day before surgery, 99mTc-labeled phytic acid is injected with hysteroscopy around and intra-tumor submucosal myometrial layer, and approximately 15 hours later, just prior to operation, lymphoscintigraphy or SPECT is performed, and SNs are detected using gamma probe (RI method) during operation. After opening abdominal cavity, or laparoscopically, indocyanine green is injected subserosally to the uterine corpus, and SNs are deteceted with naked eyes (dye method) or with near-infrared fluorescence system (fluorescence method). SNs are principally detected with both methods (RI method and dye method or fluorescence method). SNs are pathologically investigated with frozen sections intraoperatively. Regardless of the results of frozen sections, standard retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is performed and we finally evaluate the safety and efficacy of SNNS by pathological investigation with paraffin sections with cytokeratin immunohistochemistry.

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Female

Key inclusion criteria

(1)Pathologically-diagnosed endometrial cancer patients with no definite matastasis who are scheduled to receive operation including standard retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.
(2)Female patients of twenty and over who yield written consent.

Key exclusion criteria

(1)Patients suspicious of positive lymph node metastasis on pre-operative CT/MRI images.
(2)Patients with other malignancies.

Target sample size

122


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Nobuyuki Susumu

Organization

School of Medicine, Keio University

Division name

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Zip code


Address

35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-3353-1211(ext.62386)

Email

susumu35@a6.keio.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Nobuyuki Susumu

Organization

School of Medicine, Keio University

Division name

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Zip code


Address

35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-3353-1211(ext.62386)

Homepage URL

http://www.studioasia.jp/dev/keiohos/obgyn/web-2010/04research/12announce.html

Email

susumu35@a6.keio.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keio University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Keio University

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

慶應義塾大学病院(東京都)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2012 Year 05 Month 14 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Partially published


Result

URL related to results and publications

http://kompas.hosp.keio.ac.jp/contents/medical_info/presentation/201102.html

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Open public recruiting

Date of protocol fixation

2008 Year 07 Month 18 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2008 Year 10 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date


Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

Abstract of a paper submitted to 2014 International Gynecologic Cancer Society.
A hysteroscopic endometrial radio isotope injection method and a fluorescence detecting method might be suitable to detect sentinel lymph node in para-aortic region in patients with endometrial cancer
Wataru Yamagami, Nobuyuki Susumu, Fumio Kataoka, Daisuke Aoki, et al.
Aims
A sentinel node (SN) navigation surgery is thought to be one of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer. Regional lymph nodes of endometrial cancer are distributed in pelvic and para-aortic regions. The aim of this study is to clarify the suitable procedure for SN mapping.
Methods
The subjects were 89 patients that were diagnosed with endometrial cancer and were obtained written informed consent. We performed RI method (RI injection into endometrium (RI-EM) or into endocervix (RI-EC)) and dye method (green dye to subserosa (GD) or GD detected by fluorescence (FL)) for SN mapping. We investigated the detection rate, site, and number of SNs identified by each method. This study was approved by the Ethical Review committee at our institution.
Results
Metastatic rates of SNs were 6% and 8% in pelvic and para-aortic SNs. Twenty-two percent of patients with metastatic SNs had metastasis only in para-aortic lesion. The detection rates of pelvic SNs were 97%, 98%, 97%, and 90% by GD, FL, RI-EM, RI-EC methods, respectively. However, the detection rates of para-aortic SNs were 65%, 80%, 80%, and 35%, respectively. The detection rate by RI-EM method was significantly higher than that by RI-EC method. The detection rate by FL method tended to be higher than that by GD method. There was no difference of adverse effects in each method.
Conclusion
It was considered to be important to detect para-aortic SNs as well as pelvic SNs. RI-EM method or FL method might be suitable to detect SNs in para-aortic region.



Management information

Registered date

2012 Year 05 Month 14 Day

Last modified on

2017 Year 05 Month 23 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000009364


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name