UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000009578
Receipt number R000010815
Scientific Title Effect of print reminder on colorectal cancer screening in a community setting: A randomized controlled study
Date of disclosure of the study information 2012/12/20
Last modified on 2016/02/09 14:30:21

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Effect of print reminder on colorectal cancer screening in a community setting: A randomized controlled study

Acronym

Print reminder on colorectal cancer screening

Scientific Title

Effect of print reminder on colorectal cancer screening in a community setting: A randomized controlled study

Scientific Title:Acronym

Print reminder on colorectal cancer screening

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Colorectal cancer

Classification by specialty

Adult

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of print reminder on uptake of colorectal cancer screening among general population.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Colorectal Cancer screening rate

Key secondary outcomes

Knowledge and attitude on Colorectal cancer and Colorectal cancer screening


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Factorial

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Single blind -participants are blinded

Control

Active

Stratification

NO

Dynamic allocation

NO

Institution consideration

Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.

Blocking

NO

Concealment

Central registration


Intervention

No. of arms

3

Purpose of intervention

Prevention

Type of intervention

Behavior,custom

Interventions/Control_1

In the intervention group 1, the printed reminder is mailed to the participants' house from local government in December, 2012, in order to inform (a)they are due for screening, (b) morbidity of colorectal cancer, (c) 5-year survival rate by stage, (d) screening procedure.

Interventions/Control_2

In the intervention group 2, the printed reminder is mailed to the participants' house from local government in December, 2012, in order to inform (a) they are due for screening, (b) morbidity of colorectal cancer, (c) 5-year survival rate by stage, (d) screening procedure, (e) importance of repeated screening, (f) positive predictive value of colorectal cancer screening.

Interventions/Control_3

Although no reminder is delivered to the control group, control group is exposed to routine publicity campaigns that inform the residents about the colorectal cancer screening program by the local government through its website and monthly government newsletter.

Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

40 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

69 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

The individuals selected for inclusion in the study meet the following criteria: (a) registered in the population registry of the local government as of October 2012; and (b) 46-69 years old.

Key exclusion criteria

The excluded individuals in the study meet the following criteria: (a) those who receive free coupon provided by the local government; and (b) no recorded FOBT in the previous 7 months.

Target sample size

4500


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Hiroshi Saito

Organization

National Cancer Center

Division name

Screening Assessment & Management Division

Zip code


Address

5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-3542-2511

Email



Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Hiroshi Saito

Organization

National Cancer Center

Division name

Screening Assessment & Management Division

Zip code


Address

5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-3542-2511

Homepage URL

http://canscreen.ncc.go.jp/management/index.html

Email

crc-manual@ml.res.ncc.go.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Screening Assessment & Management Division, National Cancer Center

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

八王子市(東京都)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2012 Year 12 Month 20 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

http://canscreen.ncc.go.jp/management/index.html

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results

Out of 1,156 respondents, 81 (7.0%) participated in colorectal cancer screening. 67 participants (9.7%) in the intervention groups participated in colorectal cancer screening, whereas only 14 (3.0%) of the control group participated in screening (p < 0.001). In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed that 28 (7.3%) of intervention group 1 revealed statistically-significant attendance over control group (OR=2.54, p=0.005). Also, 39 (12.5%) of intervention group 2 revealed statistically-significant attendance over control group (OR=4.59, p<0.001). Furthermore, there was significant difference in screening attendance between control group 1 and control group 2 (OR=1.81, p=0.029).
With respect to recipients of the intervention groups were much more likely to have good knowledge than were recipients of the control group (p<0.001). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in attitude between the groups (p=0.294).

Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2012 Year 10 Month 10 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2012 Year 12 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2013 Year 05 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2013 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2013 Year 08 Month 30 Day

Date analysis concluded

2013 Year 12 Month 31 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2012 Year 12 Month 18 Day

Last modified on

2016 Year 02 Month 09 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000010815


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name