Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000009279 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000010901 |
Scientific Title | Efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CT colonography |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2012/11/07 |
Last modified on | 2014/08/15 09:42:15 |
Efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CT colonography
Efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CTC
Efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CT colonography
Efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CTC
Japan |
Healthy individual
Gastroenterology | Radiology |
Others
NO
Evaluation of efficacy of automated carbon dioxide insufflation in CT colonography
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Assessment of colon and small intestine distension per segment.
Data on perceived burden of CT colonography were collected using visual analogue scale (VAS) and a questionnaire.
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Placebo
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Central registration
2
Diagnosis
Device,equipment |
CT colonography using automated carbon dioxide insufflation.
CT colonography using manual carbon dioxide insufflation.
40 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1) Healthy individual.
2) Major functions of organs of the subjects are in a good condition.
3) Aged 40 years or older.
4) Signed informed consent forms are obtained by the patients.
1) Patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
2) Fulfillment of clinical criteria for diagnosis of FAP or HNPCC (Amsterdam criteria).
3) Contraindication for using Buscopan.
4) Previous colorectal surgery.
5) Gastric or intestinal stenosis, abdominal adhesions, bowel obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon.
6) Evidence of an increased risk in carrying out bowel preparation or CTC exams.
7) Possibility of pregnancy.
8) Patients with psychological conditions that contraindicate CT colonography or make them irrelevant to participate in the trial.
9) Claustrophobia.
10) Severe deafness.
11) Subjects whose eligibility for this clinical trial is not appropriate by other reasons.
100
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Koichi Nagata MD PhD |
Sakakibara Sapia Tower Clinic
Radiology Section
1-7-12 Sapiatower 7F, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005, Japan
03-5288-0011
Nagata7@aol.com
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Koichi Nagata MD PhD |
Sakakibara Sapia Tower Clinic
Radiology Section
1-7-12 Sapiatower 7F, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0005, Japan
03-5288-0011
Nagata7@aol.com
Sakakibara Sapia Tower Clinic
None
Self funding
NO
榊原サピアタワークリニック(東京都)
2012 | Year | 11 | Month | 07 | Day |
Published
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsgcs/51/4/51_465/_article/-char/ja/
Automated insufflation significantly improved distention overall compared to manual insufflation. No significant difference was seen in Visual Analogue Scale between manual insufflation and automated insufflation.
Automated carbon dioxide insufflation significantly improved colonic distention compared to manual insufflation. Participant acceptance was similar to that for manual insufflation.
Main results already published
2012 | Year | 05 | Month | 06 | Day |
2012 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2013 | Year | 01 | Month | 30 | Day |
2013 | Year | 02 | Month | 28 | Day |
2013 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
2013 | Year | 04 | Month | 30 | Day |
2012 | Year | 11 | Month | 07 | Day |
2014 | Year | 08 | Month | 15 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000010901
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |