UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000010053
Receipt number R000011772
Scientific Title Effect of lidocaine on preventing laryngospasm: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2013/02/18
Last modified on 2014/04/06 16:05:37

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Effect of lidocaine on preventing laryngospasm: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acronym

Effect of lidocaine on preventing laryngospasm: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scientific Title

Effect of lidocaine on preventing laryngospasm: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scientific Title:Acronym

Effect of lidocaine on preventing laryngospasm: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

laryngospasm

Classification by specialty

Anesthesiology

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To clarify whether lidocaine is effective to prevent laryngospasm or not

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary outcome of this present meta-analysis was the incidence of laryngospasm.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit

15 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

All randomized controlled trials comparing lidocaine with any comparator (i.e., placebo, any drugs, or no treatment) that reported the incidence of laryngospasm are included in this study. Eligibility is not restricted by language, type of surgery, patient age, or anesthetic technique.

Key exclusion criteria

We exclud studies which did not have adequate comparator. We also exclud data from case reports, comments or letters to the editor, reviews, and animal studies.

Target sample size



Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Takahiro Mihara

Organization

Kanagawa Children's Medical Center

Division name

Department of Anesthesiology

Zip code


Address

2-138-4 Mutsukawa, Minami-ku, Yokohama 232-8555, Japan

TEL

045-711-2351

Email

miharaxxxtotoro@yahoo.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Takahiro Mihara

Organization

Kanagawa Children's Medical Center

Division name

Department of Anesthesiology

Zip code


Address

2-138-4 Mutsukawa, Minami-ku, Yokohama 232-8555, Japan

TEL

045-711-2351

Homepage URL


Email

miharaxxxtotoro@yahoo.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Kanagawa Children's Medical Center

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2013 Year 02 Month 18 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2013 Year 02 Month 15 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2013 Year 02 Month 18 Day

Last follow-up date


Date of closure to data entry

2013 Year 06 Month 02 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2013 Year 06 Month 02 Day

Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

A data collection sheet is created and included data on: (i) ASA-Physical Status, (ii) age, (iii) type of surgery, (iv) type of anesthesia, (v) type of airway device, (vi) route of administration of lidocaine, (vii) dose of lidocaine , (viii) timing of administration, (ix) timing of assessing laryngospasm, (x) type of control (i.e., placebo, other drug, or no treatment), (xi) primary outcome of individual studies, patient number of (xii)lidocaine group and (xiii) control group, number of incidence of laryngospasm in (xiv) lidocaine group and (xv) control group. When multiple control groups including placebo group were made in individual studies, we choose the placebo group as a comparator group in this meta-analysis. Two authors (TM and KU) extract the data independently from the studies included and then cross-check the data. We assess the risk of bias as described by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Subgroup analyses are performed for the primary outcome according to the route of administration, the dose of lidocaine, patient age, and risk of bias. Dichotomous data are summarized using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). For statistically significant differences in outcome, the number needed to treat (NNT) is calculated in order to estimate the overall clinical impact of the intervention. Heterogeneity is quantified with the I2 statistic. To combine the results of the studies, we use the random effect model or fixed effect model according to the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and a Begg's rank correlation test. In the case of suspected publication bias we intended to use the trim and fill method to assess the impact of potential publication bias.


Management information

Registered date

2013 Year 02 Month 16 Day

Last modified on

2014 Year 04 Month 06 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000011772


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name