UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000011463
Receipt number R000013402
Scientific Title Comparison of topical anesthetics to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2013/08/12
Last modified on 2019/04/30 03:40:21

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Comparison of topical anesthetics to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Acronym

Comparison of topical anesthetics to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Scientific Title

Comparison of topical anesthetics to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Scientific Title:Acronym

Comparison of topical anesthetics to relieve venipuncture pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Healthy adults
Healthy children

Classification by specialty

Adult Child

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Comparison between lidocaine-prilocaine cream and high-dose lidocaine cream to relieve venipuncture pain

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

Score of visual analog scale

Key secondary outcomes

1. Duration time for blood sampling
2. Site of blood sampling
3. Persons who take blood samples
4. Dose of blood samples
5. Times of venipuncture
6. Side effects


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Cross-over

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Double blind -all involved are blinded

Control

Active

Stratification

NO

Dynamic allocation

NO

Institution consideration

Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.

Blocking

YES

Concealment

Central registration


Intervention

No. of arms

4

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

1. lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Right Arm)
2. high-dose lidocaine cream (Left Arm)

Interventions/Control_2

1. high-dose lidocaine cream (Left Arm)
2. lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Right Arm)

Interventions/Control_3

1. high-dose lidocaine cream (Right Arm)
2. lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Left Arm)

Interventions/Control_4

1. lidocaine-prilocaine cream (Left Arm)
2. high-dose lidocaine cream (Right Arm)

Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

60 years-old >

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1) Staff of National Center for Child Health and Development
2) Volunteers who are provided informed, written consent for participation in Japanese

Key exclusion criteria

1. Volunteers who have hypersensitivity to anesthetic agents
2. Volunteers who have skin diseases (erosion or eczema) on the upper arms and/or hands
3. Volunteers who have a experience of blood exam using lidocaine-prilocaine cream or high-dose lidocaine cream
4. Volunteers who judges that the physician is inappropriate

Target sample size

24


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Yukihiro
Middle name
Last name Ohya

Organization

National Center for Child Health and Development

Division name

Division of Allergy

Zip code

157-8535

Address

2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-3416-0181

Email

ohya-y@ncchd.go.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Nobuaki
Middle name
Last name Michihata

Organization

National Center for Child Health and Development

Division name

Department of Postgraduate Education and Training

Zip code

157-8535

Address

2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

TEL

03-3416-0181

Homepage URL


Email

michihata-tky@umin.org


Sponsor or person

Institute

National Center for Child Health and Development

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Japan Environment and Children's Study, Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Japanese Governmental office

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

National Center for Child Health and Development

Address

2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Tel

03-3416-0181

Email

seiiku-chiken@ncchd.go.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

国立成育医療研究センター(東京都)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2013 Year 08 Month 12 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

http://bit.ly/crossoverEMLA

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

http://bit.ly/crossoverEMLA

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

24

Results

There was no significant difference between EMLA cream and LMX5 cream (difference 2.83; 95% confidence interval -11.25 to 16.92; P value 0.693).

Compared with 65 minutes or less of coating time of the local anesthetic, the time of more than 65 minutes significantly reduced the VAS scores (difference -22.4, 95% confidence interval -39.5 to -5.34, P value 0.010).


Results date posted

2019 Year 04 Month 30 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

The mean age was 36.7 years (range 25 to 29 years) and males were 33%.

There were no statistically significant differences of background characteristics among the four groups.

Participant flow

One participant was initially assigned to group 4, but when the cream was applied, the participant was mistaken regarding left and right. Due to the nature of this trial, the as-treated analysis was deemed to be more appropriate than the intention-to-treat analysis, and the participant was reassigned to group 1.

Adverse events

Regarding side effects, only one participant complained of mild itching at the application area of EMLA cream. Others did not have skin erythema or any serious side effects.

Outcome measures

There were no significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes between EMLA cream and LMX5 cream.

Plan to share IPD

none

IPD sharing Plan description

Not applicable


Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2013 Year 08 Month 07 Day

Date of IRB

2013 Year 08 Month 05 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2013 Year 08 Month 13 Day

Last follow-up date

2013 Year 08 Month 13 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2013 Year 08 Month 13 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2013 Year 08 Month 13 Day

Date analysis concluded

2019 Year 04 Month 20 Day


Other

Other related information

At the time of submission of a paper about this research, a review request was made, and some protocols were corrected (the coating time of the local anesthetics was added as secondary outcomes).


Management information

Registered date

2013 Year 08 Month 12 Day

Last modified on

2019 Year 04 Month 30 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000013402


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name