Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000016434 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000019083 |
Scientific Title | A utility of ultrasound-guided PICC catheterization |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2015/02/03 |
Last modified on | 2024/03/29 16:50:05 |
A utility of ultrasound-guided PICC catheterization
USGPICC
A utility of ultrasound-guided PICC catheterization
USGPICC
Japan |
Surgery,Oto-rhino-laryngology,Dental medecine
Surgery in general | Oto-rhino-laryngology | Dental medicine |
Malignancy
NO
All this time, we use chest X-ray to catheterize PICC.If we suggest the utility of this ultrasound-guided method, catheterization at bedside will make staffs unbusy. We expected the PICC length to insert by body landmark and ultrasound methods, and compare the difference.
Safety,Efficacy
Distance between catheter tips and the carina with the landmark or ultrasound method. Comfirmation not to placing catheters in internal jugular vein.
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Uncontrolled
1
Treatment
Maneuver |
Compare the length of three method. A method of body landmark, of ultrasound method, and of catherization tips on the carina.
18 | years-old | <= |
100 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
The patients scheduling PICC catheterization
The patients contraindicated for inserting PICC, BMI over 35, the patients who has abnormality of arm angioplany
25
1st name | TATUO |
Middle name | |
Last name | NAKAMOTO |
Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of anethesiology
5918025
3-1179NagasonechoKitakuSakaicity
0722523561
tnakamoto@msic.med.osaka-cu.ac.jp
1st name | RINA |
Middle name | |
Last name | HORIE |
Osaka Rosai Hospital
Department of anethesiology
5918025
3-1179NagasonechoKitakuSakaicity
0722523561
rhorie@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Osaka Rosai Hospital Department of Anesthesiology
none
Other
Osaka Rosai Hospital
3-1179NagasonechoKitakuSakaicity
0722523561
soumukatyou@org.go.jp
NO
2015 | Year | 02 | Month | 03 | Day |
none
Unpublished
none
27
Twenty-seven patients were observed over a 6-month period. Of these, one patient had a very thin vein and gave up on the implantation itself. 23 of 26 patients were successfully implanted under ultrasound guidance, with a fixation length (U) of 33.9 (average) cm and a fixation length (X) of 35.1 (average) cm, in good agreement with a bias of -1.2 (average) cm and a 95% agreement limit of -6.1 to 3.8 cm (Figure).
2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
Adult patients with perioperative PICC placement
Requests anesthesiology for PICC implantation
non
In the operating room, the ulnar vein of the right upper arm was punctured under ultrasound guidance, and the PICC tip was drawn at the confluence of the internal jugular and subclavian veins. Next, under fluoroscopic guidance, the PICC tip was adjusted 1 cm caudal to the tracheal bifurcation to determine the fixation length (X). The objectives were 1) to demonstrate non-inferiority of fixation length (U) and 2) to ensure that the PICC was placed in the central vein without straying into the internal jugular vein.
Completed
2014 | Year | 12 | Month | 11 | Day |
2014 | Year | 12 | Month | 11 | Day |
2015 | Year | 01 | Month | 05 | Day |
2015 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2015 | Year | 02 | Month | 03 | Day |
2024 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000019083
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |