Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000016949 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000019668 |
Scientific Title | Randomized control study comparing reconstruction procedures after esophagectomy -gastric tube reconstruction vs gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis- |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2015/03/31 |
Last modified on | 2019/10/01 10:16:55 |
Randomized control study comparing reconstruction procedures after esophagectomy -gastric tube reconstruction vs gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis-
Randomized control study comparing reconstruction procedures after esophagectomy -gastric tube reconstruction vs gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis-
Randomized control study comparing reconstruction procedures after esophagectomy -gastric tube reconstruction vs gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis-
Randomized control study comparing reconstruction procedures after esophagectomy -gastric tube reconstruction vs gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis-
Japan |
Patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer who are planned to undergo esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and 2 or 3 field lymphadenectomy
Gastrointestinal surgery |
Malignancy
NO
To examine whether gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en Y anastomosis is more effective than conventional gastric tube reconstruction in preventing postoperative gastroduodenal content reflux and delayed gastric emptying
Efficacy
Postoperative QOL at 1year assessed by DAUGS-32 questionare
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
YES
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Numbered container method
2
Treatment
Maneuver |
After patients are randomly allocated to RY and Non-RY groups, RY group undergo gastric tube reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en anastomosis.
After patients are randomly allocated to RY and Non-RY groups, Non-RY group undergo conventional gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy.
Not applicable |
80 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
1. histologically proven esophageal cancer by endoscopic biopsy
2. resectable cases, cT1b-3,Nany,M0 by preoperative staging,
3. preserve normal swallowing function and can eat and drink
4. 80 years old or younger
5. PS 0-2
6. Vital organ functions within 7days before entry are preserved.
7. Written informed consentis ontained from each patient.
1. synchronous other malignant cancer within 1 year
2. Miocardial infarction, Master two steppositive on ECG
3. preoperative respiratory test, FEV1.0 is less than 50%
4. prior chemotherapy or radiationtherapy within 6 months
5. prior gastric or intestinal resection
6. severe absorptive disturbance
7. severe postoperative complications (anastomotic leakage, ileus, intraabdominal abcess, pneumonia, etc)
8. pregnant
9. other severe co-morbidities
10. In case where surgeon judge that entry to the study is impossible.
60
1st name | Masahiko |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yano |
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
537-8511
Nakamichi 1-3-3, Higashinari-ku, Osaka
06-6972-1181
yano-ma@mc.pref.osaka.jp
1st name | Kazuyuki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Itoh |
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases
Research Institute
537-8511
Nakamichi 1-3-3, Higashinari-ku, Osaka
06-6977-6151
kbyori01@mc.pref.osaka.jp
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases
none
Self funding
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, IRB
Nakamichi 1-3-3, Higashinari-ku, Osaka
06-6972-1181
nakatah@opho.jp
NO
2015 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000019668
Published
https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/icdr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000019668
60
Operation time and blood loss volume were higher in the RY group. Pancreatic amylase concentrations in the gastric conduit were higher in the non-RY group. Endoscopic examination showed residual gastric content in 7/17 patients in the non-RY group but in none in the RY group. QOL was significantly favorable in the RY group with regard to reflux symptoms and food passage dysfunction. Body weight changes, serum albumin levels, and peripheral blood lymphocyte counts were not significantly different.
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 01 | Day |
2019 | Year | 08 | Month | 12 | Day |
The background characteristics of patients were not significantly different between the groups.
Sixty patients with thoracic esophageal cancer scheduled to undergo esophagectomy with retrosternal gastric tube reconstruction were randomly allocated to standard gastric reconstruction (non-RY, n=31) or gastric reconstruction with duodenal diversion plus Roux-en-Y anastomosis (RY, n=29) groups.
Incidences of postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, ileus, and hemorrhage, did not significantly differ. Postoperative death did not occur in any group.
Primary endpoint was quality of life assessed by DAUGS-32 score 1 year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were the extent of postoperative duodenal juice reflux into the gastric tube, postoperative morbidity, endoscopic findings, body weight changes, and nutritional status.
Completed
2011 | Year | 01 | Month | 27 | Day |
2011 | Year | 03 | Month | 30 | Day |
2011 | Year | 06 | Month | 01 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2018 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2015 | Year | 03 | Month | 27 | Day |
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 01 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000019668
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
2017/03/28 | ③医学研究計画書(RY vs non-RY)延長.doc |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |