UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000018668
Receipt number R000021617
Scientific Title Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
Date of disclosure of the study information 2015/08/14
Last modified on 2015/08/31 08:38:02

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation

Acronym

Study protocol; a meta-epidemiological investigation in overstatements in abstract conclusions

Scientific Title

Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation

Scientific Title:Acronym

Study protocol; a meta-epidemiological investigation in overstatements in abstract conclusions

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Mental disorders

Classification by specialty

Psychiatry

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

We aim to evaluate overstated abstract conclusions in comparison to the corresponding full text results in trials claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry. We will also examine their predictors.

Basic objectives2

Others

Basic objectives -Others

Meta-epidemiologic study on reporting bias

Trial characteristics_1

Others

Trial characteristics_2

Others

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

The proportion of studies showing overstatements in the abstract conclusion compared to the full text results relative to all the included trials.

Key secondary outcomes

The proportion (shown as relative to all the included trials) of studies showing overstatements in abstract conclusion among those studies claiming superiority of intervention of treatment. The proportion of studies that exhibit overstatements among those that claim partial effectiveness of intervention.


Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

All randomized controlled trials published in 2014 claiming effectiveness of intervention for mental disorder(s) in their abstract conclusions. The selection will cover any and all kinds of interventions.

Key exclusion criteria

Studies with an abstract conclusion in which the primary outcomes were declared, and explicitly stated that there was no significant difference between the intervention and control arm in the primary outcomes. In addition, we will exclude studies without conclusion or discussion section in the abstract, trials with more than two arms, and unpublished trials. Secondary analysis studies, feasibility studies, and cost effectiveness studies will not be included either.

Target sample size

100


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Shinohara, Kiyomi

Organization

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health

Division name

Health Promotion and Human Behaviour

Zip code


Address

Yoshida-Konoe Cho Sakyo-ku, Kyoto

TEL

0757539491

Email

shinohara.kiyomi.75r@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Shinohara, Kiyomi

Organization

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health

Division name

Health Promotion and Human Behaviour

Zip code


Address

Yoshida-Konoe Cho Sakyo-ku, Kyoto

TEL

0757539491

Homepage URL

http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html

Email

shinohara.kiyomi.75r@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

none

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2015 Year 08 Month 14 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications

http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Open public recruiting

Date of protocol fixation

2015 Year 07 Month 31 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2015 Year 08 Month 03 Day

Last follow-up date

2015 Year 12 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2015 Year 12 Month 31 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2015 Year 12 Month 31 Day

Date analysis concluded

2016 Year 01 Month 31 Day


Other

Other related information

We will source RCTs published in 2014 from Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that claim effectiveness of any intervention for mental disorders. The abstract conclusions will be categorised into three types: superior (only stating significant superiority of intervention to control), limited (suggesting intervention was partially significantly superior to control), and equal (claiming equal effectiveness of intervention as control). The full texts will also be classified as one of the following based on the primary outcome results: significant (all primary outcomes were statistically significant in favour of the intervention), mixed (primary outcomes included both significant and non-significant results), or all non-significant results. By comparing the abstract conclusion classification and that of the corresponding full text, we will assess whether each study exhibited overstatements in its abstract conclusion.


Management information

Registered date

2015 Year 08 Month 14 Day

Last modified on

2015 Year 08 Month 31 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021617


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name