Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000018668 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000021617 |
Scientific Title | Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2015/08/14 |
Last modified on | 2015/08/31 08:38:02 |
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
Study protocol; a meta-epidemiological investigation in overstatements in abstract conclusions
Overstatements in abstract conclusions claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry: A study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
Study protocol; a meta-epidemiological investigation in overstatements in abstract conclusions
Japan |
Mental disorders
Psychiatry |
Others
NO
We aim to evaluate overstated abstract conclusions in comparison to the corresponding full text results in trials claiming effectiveness of interventions in psychiatry. We will also examine their predictors.
Others
Meta-epidemiologic study on reporting bias
Others
Others
Not applicable
The proportion of studies showing overstatements in the abstract conclusion compared to the full text results relative to all the included trials.
The proportion (shown as relative to all the included trials) of studies showing overstatements in abstract conclusion among those studies claiming superiority of intervention of treatment. The proportion of studies that exhibit overstatements among those that claim partial effectiveness of intervention.
Others,meta-analysis etc
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
All randomized controlled trials published in 2014 claiming effectiveness of intervention for mental disorder(s) in their abstract conclusions. The selection will cover any and all kinds of interventions.
Studies with an abstract conclusion in which the primary outcomes were declared, and explicitly stated that there was no significant difference between the intervention and control arm in the primary outcomes. In addition, we will exclude studies without conclusion or discussion section in the abstract, trials with more than two arms, and unpublished trials. Secondary analysis studies, feasibility studies, and cost effectiveness studies will not be included either.
100
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Shinohara, Kiyomi |
Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
Health Promotion and Human Behaviour
Yoshida-Konoe Cho Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
0757539491
shinohara.kiyomi.75r@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Shinohara, Kiyomi |
Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
Health Promotion and Human Behaviour
Yoshida-Konoe Cho Sakyo-ku, Kyoto
0757539491
http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html
shinohara.kiyomi.75r@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
none
Self funding
NO
2015 | Year | 08 | Month | 14 | Day |
http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html
Unpublished
http://ebmh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp/r-ebm.html
Open public recruiting
2015 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2015 | Year | 08 | Month | 03 | Day |
2015 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2015 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2015 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
2016 | Year | 01 | Month | 31 | Day |
We will source RCTs published in 2014 from Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that claim effectiveness of any intervention for mental disorders. The abstract conclusions will be categorised into three types: superior (only stating significant superiority of intervention to control), limited (suggesting intervention was partially significantly superior to control), and equal (claiming equal effectiveness of intervention as control). The full texts will also be classified as one of the following based on the primary outcome results: significant (all primary outcomes were statistically significant in favour of the intervention), mixed (primary outcomes included both significant and non-significant results), or all non-significant results. By comparing the abstract conclusion classification and that of the corresponding full text, we will assess whether each study exhibited overstatements in its abstract conclusion.
2015 | Year | 08 | Month | 14 | Day |
2015 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021617
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |