UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000019573
Receipt number R000022627
Scientific Title 18F flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with 11CPIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease
Date of disclosure of the study information 2015/11/02
Last modified on 2017/01/10 11:00:14

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

18F flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with 11CPIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease

Acronym

18F flutemetamol and 11CPIB PET imaging across Alzheimer's disease

Scientific Title

18F flutemetamol amyloid-beta PET imaging compared with 11CPIB across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease

Scientific Title:Acronym

18F flutemetamol and 11CPIB PET imaging across Alzheimer's disease

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Alzheimer's disease

Classification by specialty

Neurology Psychiatry Radiology

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The aim was to identify the amyloid beta AB deposition by PET imaging with18Flabeled PIB derivative 18F flutemetamol FMM across a spectrum of Alzheimer's disease AD, and compared AB deposition between 18F FMM and 11CPIB PET imaging.

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The cortical FMM SUVR in AD patients was significantly greater than in older HC subjects 1.76 +- 0.23 vs 1.30 +- 0.26, p<0.01. Six-eight MCI patients had a bimodal distribution of SUVR, and 29 of them 42.6% had positive scans. Cortical FMM SUVR values were strongly correlated with PIB DVR r=0.94, n=145, p<0.001.

Key secondary outcomes

Cortical FMM SUVR was negatively correlated with MMSE scores r= -0.51, n=145, p<0.05 and positively with CDR SB scores r=0.49, n=145, p<0.05 when all groups were analyzed together.
There was no significant difference in the mean cortical FMM SUVR between APOE 4 carriers and non-carriers in each group


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Prevention

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

11CPIB was injected intravenously as a bolus with a mean dose of 551.5 +- 39.7 MBq. Dynamic PET scanning in the three dimensional mode was performed for 60 min using a predetermined protocol of 31 frames as follows: 4 x 15s, 8 x 30s,
9 x 60s,2 x 120s, and 8 x 300s.

Interventions/Control_2

A single dose of 18 FFMM of 197.0 +- 5.9 MBq was injected as a bolus. The image acquisition window of 18F FMM extended from 85 to 115 minutes 6 x5 min. frames.
The retention of 18F FMM was calculated as the regional to cerebellum standardized uptake value ratios SUVR. Standardized uptake values, defined as the decay corrected brain radioactivity concentration, were normalized for the injected dose and body weight. The regional FMM SUVR in each cortical region

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

40 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

90 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

AD subjects were older than 56 years, and met the core clinical criteria of the NIA Alzheimer's Association for probable AD.
MCI subjects were older than 56 years, and met the Core Clinical Criteria for MCI proposed by the NIA Alzheimer's Association.
The normal cognitive status of HC subjects was required to be a MMSE score of 28 or greater and a CDR score of 0.
All subjects or their caregiver provided written informed consent for participation.

Key exclusion criteria

AD subjects were older than 56 years, and met the core clinical criteria of the NIA-Alzheimer's Association for probable AD.
MCI subjects were older than 56 years, and met the Core Clinical Criteria for MCI proposed by the NIA-Alzheimer's Association.
The normal cognitive status of HC subjects was required to be a MMSE score of 28 or greater and a CDR score of 0.
All subjects or their caregiver provided written informed consent for participation.
Participants were excluded if they had other systemic or brain diseases,including degenerative,vascular, depressive, traumatic, medical comorbidities, mixed disease, or traumatic brain injury.

Target sample size

200


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Sizuo Hatashita

Organization

Shonan-Atsugi hospital

Division name

Department of neurosurgery

Zip code


Address

Nurumizu118-1 Atsugi-City,Kanagawa,Japan

TEL

046-223-3636

Email

tiken2@shonan-atsugi.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Sizuo Hatashita

Organization

Shonan-Atsugi hospital

Division name

Department of neurosurgery

Zip code


Address

Nurumizu118-1 Atsugi-City,Kanagawa,Japan

TEL

046-297-7576

Homepage URL


Email

tiken2@shonan-atsugi.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Shonan-Atsugi hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Shonan-Atsugi hospital

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2015 Year 11 Month 02 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2011 Year 11 Month 28 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2011 Year 11 Month 28 Day

Last follow-up date

2016 Year 11 Month 22 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2015 Year 10 Month 30 Day

Last modified on

2017 Year 01 Month 10 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022627


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name