Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000022040 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000023905 |
Scientific Title | A multicenter randomized controlled crossover trial comparing the efficacy of LABA or LAMA in patient with COPD |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2016/04/24 |
Last modified on | 2021/04/28 17:14:38 |
A multicenter randomized controlled crossover trial comparing the efficacy of LABA or LAMA in patient with COPD
Investigation of treatment response in patient with COPD
A multicenter randomized controlled crossover trial comparing the efficacy of LABA or LAMA in patient with COPD
Investigation of treatment response in patient with COPD
Japan |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Pneumology |
Others
NO
To examine the background factors of the patients who showed different treatment responses in being administered tiotropium and indacaterol. The patients were in the second or third stage of COPD. The medicine was administered in order, not simultaneously.
Safety,Efficacy
To investigate the background factors of the patients who showed significant differences through a pulmonary function test four weeks after the intervention.
To investigate the background factors of the patients who showed significant differences through CAT, TDI and IPAQ four weeks after the intervention.
Interventional
Cross-over
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
2
Treatment
Medicine |
We evaluate the result after the patients inhaled tiotropium for four weeks. Then, we switch from tiotropium to indicaterol, observe the progress for four weeks, and evaluate the result.
We evaluate the result after the patients inhaled indicaterol for four weeks. Then, we switch from indicaterol to tiotropium, observe the progress for four weeks, and evaluate the result.
40 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1)A Patient who is visiting our outpatient clinic, is over 40 years of age, and has smoking history
2)A patient who is classified into the second or third stage of COPD in pulmonary function test.
3)A patient who smoke 1 pack per day for 10 years or more
4)A patient who agreed to participate in the study with the written informed consent
1)A patient who cannot be performed a respiratory function test appropriately
2)A Patients with asthma.
3)A patients who have has experienced an acute COPD exacerbation or respiratory tract infection within the past 4 weeks prior to the informed consent
4)A patients with advanced malignant tumor
5)A patients who are is pregnant
6)A patients who are is allergic to tiotropium or ipratropium
7)A patients receiving oxygen inhalation for more than 15 hours/day
8) A patient whom the doctor in charge judged unsuitable as subjected is excluded.
140
1st name | Hironori |
Middle name | |
Last name | Sagara |
Showa University School of Medicine
Division of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine
142-8666
1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, JAPAN
03-3784-8704
sagarah@med.showa-u.ac.jp
1st name | Kuniaki |
Middle name | |
Last name | Hirai |
Showa University School of Medicine
Division of Allergology and Respiratory Medicine
142-8666
1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, JAPAN
03-3784-8000
medi123@infoseek.jp
Showa University School of Medicine
None
Self funding
Showa University
1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, JAPAN
03-3784-8000
ctsc.admin@ofc.showa-u.ac.jp
NO
2016 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_up_reg_f3.cgi
Unpublished
https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_up_reg_f3.cgi
40
The examination was finished without a clear harmful phenomenon.
The final analysis had not been finished, but LAMA accepted the patient who was easy to be effective.
The objective effect did not accord with the impression of the patient for the drug.
The analysis was over and was announced at the Respiratory Society of 2018.
2019 | Year | 11 | Month | 10 | Day |
The clinical characteristics of participating patients were not significantly different from those of previous studies.
After two types of bronchodilators were crossed over and inhaled, an objective evaluation and a subjective evaluation were performed.
There were no adverse events in the patient.
We did not find any characteristic results in objective evaluation items such as respiratory function, CAT, and mMRC and subjective evaluation items.
Completed
2016 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2015 | Year | 11 | Month | 27 | Day |
2016 | Year | 04 | Month | 25 | Day |
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 26 | Day |
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 26 | Day |
2017 | Year | 10 | Month | 26 | Day |
2018 | Year | 10 | Month | 26 | Day |
We excluded Yamanashi red cross hospital.
We are going to concluding our study when about 60 patients are included.
It is because, more than patients will not participate in our study.
So, we are going to analyze about 60 people now.
2016 | Year | 04 | Month | 24 | Day |
2021 | Year | 04 | Month | 28 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000023905
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |