UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000024525
Receipt number R000028207
Scientific Title Early and mid-term outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection
Date of disclosure of the study information 2016/11/25
Last modified on 2017/05/03 16:20:32

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Early and mid-term outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection

Acronym

EVT for CAAD

Scientific Title

Early and mid-term outcomes of endovascular treatment for chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection

Scientific Title:Acronym

EVT for CAAD

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

CAAD

Classification by specialty

Vascular surgery Cardiovascular surgery

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To evaluate endovascular treatment for enlarged chronic aneurysmal aortic dissection

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

death
paraplegia
complete thrombosis of false lumen

Key secondary outcomes

freedom from re-entry closure
freedom from secondary intervention
remodeling of aorta


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Self control

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Maneuver

Interventions/Control_1

Endovascular treatment for CAAD
1-10years

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Patients with clinical course that had elapsed at least one year after the onset of dissection

Key exclusion criteria

acute dissection

Target sample size

80


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yuji Kanaoka

Organization

Jikei University School of Medicine

Division name

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery

Zip code


Address

NishiShinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-3433-1111

Email

yujikana@msn.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yuji Kanaoka

Organization

Jikei University School of Medicine

Division name

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery

Zip code


Address

NishiShinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo

TEL

03-3433-1111

Homepage URL


Email

yujikana@msn.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery Jikei University School of Medicine

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery Jikei University School of Medicine

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

東京慈恵会医科大学


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2016 Year 11 Month 25 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results

Early outcomes
No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, sex, duration from dissection onset to treatment, maximum short axis diameter of the CAAD, preoperative condition, and follow-up observation period, although the duration from dissection onset to treatment tended to be longer in the CE group than in the PE group. Operative death occurred in 1 out of 74 patients (1.4%); 2.3% in the PE group and 0% in CE group. Technical success in the PE and CE groups were 97.6% and 96.8%, respectively. The device most commonly used to perform entry closure was the TAG (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff AZ, USA), and no significant difference in the frequency of use was observed between the two groups.

In the patient that died in the PE group, the tear in the arch could not be closed; therefore, the carotid artery was concomitantly reconstructed using the Chimney method. Furthermore, due to the fact that this patient previously underwent coronary artery bypass grafting using the left internal thoracic artery, the SG was extended proximally after creating a bypass from the left common carotid artery to the left subclavian artery. However, the entry site could not be completely closed and blood pressure decreased during surgery. Unfortunately, the patient died from cardiac failure on the same day due to prolonged hypotension. In one patient in the CE group, we attempted to close a renal artery tear, but a new intimal tear formed. In this case, conversion to open surgical repair was performed the next day and the patient was eventually discharged from the hospital without any major complications. In another patient in the CE group, no central nervous or spinal cord complications were observed, except for delayed paraplegia on postoperative day (POD) 2.

Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

No longer recruiting

Date of protocol fixation

2016 Year 10 Month 20 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2016 Year 10 Month 20 Day

Last follow-up date


Date of closure to data entry

2017 Year 05 Month 02 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2017 Year 05 Month 02 Day

Date analysis concluded

2017 Year 05 Month 02 Day


Other

Other related information

Aortic remodeling
Review of aortic remodeling in the PE group revealed that closure of entry sites that were mainly located on the aortic arch caused rapid expansion of the true lumen of the aortic arch and the descending thoracic aorta. We also observed gradual shrinkage of the diameter of the entire aorta. However, although we observed an expansion of the true lumen of the abdominal aorta, no changes in the aortic diameter were observed. In addition, we discovered that the expansion of the true lumen was approximately 1.8-fold in the thoracic aorta versus 1.3-fold in the abdominal aorta (Table 4). These results indicated that the degree of expansion was also limited.


Management information

Registered date

2016 Year 10 Month 21 Day

Last modified on

2017 Year 05 Month 03 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000028207


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name