UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000031044
Receipt number R000035437
Scientific Title Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles
Date of disclosure of the study information 2018/01/29
Last modified on 2019/02/10 20:50:28

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles

Acronym

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles

Scientific Title

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles

Scientific Title:Acronym

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus Insulin Degludec in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

diabetes

Classification by specialty

Endocrinology and Metabolism

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300U/ml, insulin deguldec.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary endpoints of this study included the efficacy and safety outcomes based on the CGM parameters. The efficacy outcome was the mean percentage of time within the predefined CGM glucose range of 70-180 mg/dl, expressed as target range, for 3 consecutive days of each treatment period. The safety outcome was the mean percentage of time with glucose < 70 mg/dl, expressed as hypoglycemia range.

Key secondary outcomes

Secondary endpoints based on CGM included the 24h mean glucose level, nocturnal (0:00-6:00) mean glucose level, morning (8:00-12:00) mean glucose level, afternoon (12:00-24:00) mean glucose level, 24h standard deviation (SD) of the glucose levels, 24h M-value (target glucose level 100 mg/dl), the mean percentage of time with severe hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dl), with nocturnal (0:00-6:00) hypoglycemia (< 70 mg/dl), and with hyperglycemia (> 180 mg/dl) for 3 consecutive days. The mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) was calculated from the CGM data taking into account the glycemic peaks and nadirs recorded over a 24h period for 3 consecutive days. The mean of daily difference (MODD) for a 24h period was used as an index of day-to-day glucose variability.


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Cross-over

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

In brief, participants previously treated with OADs continued their prestudy OAD treatment without any change in dose or regimen. The starting dose of Gla300 or Deg for basal insulin-naive participants was 4 units. Participants receiving basal insulin prior to the study were switched to Gla300 or Deg on a unit-for-unit dose basis without any change of bolas insulin. Participants receiving premixed insulin prior to the study were switched to basal/bolus insulin therapy with Gla300 or Deg, and the short-acting insulin on the same dose of intermediate-acting and short-acting insulin included in premixed insulin. After that, on the basis of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), basal insulin doses were titrated to a target pre-prandial glucose concentration of 100-130 mg/dl at breakfast. The basal insulin dose was titrated no more often than every 3 to 4 days. Bolus insulin was titrated using each pre-meal glycemia and pre-bedtime blood glucose 100-130 mg / dl. After determining the amount of insulin, it was confirmed that the blood glucose fluctuation by SMBG before breakfast, before lunch, before dinner and before going to bed was stabilized within 3 percentage or more and within 10 percentage, respectively, and there was no hypoglycemia.
After obtain good and stable glycemic control, we evaluated their glycemic control in a blinded fashion using a CGM for consecutive five days.

Interventions/Control_2

Subsequently, their basal insulin was switched from Gla300 to Deg and vice versa, in the treatment period. After washout of former basal insulin for more than 3 to 4 days confirmed by SMBG profile, we again evaluated their glycemic control using CGM for consecutive 5 days. CGM recorded glucose values for the last 5 days in each treatment period, and we used 3 days in the middle to complete 24h recording sets.
Each participant was given the following hospital diets with the same calorie and carbohydrate amount for individual: 25-30 kcal/ideal body weight/day with the certain component ration of calories (carbohydrate 60%, proteins 17%, and lipids 23%; breakfast 30%, lunch 35%, supper 35%).

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

90 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Minamiosaka hospital for the purpose of glycemic control and education.

Key exclusion criteria

1.Serious ketosis, history of diabetic coma or precoma
2.Pregnancy or lactation and patients scheduled
3.Serious infection, trauma, undergo surgery
4.Receiving steroid therapy.
5.Severe liver dysfunction
6.Type 1 diabetes
7.Hypersensitivity to degludec/aspart, glargin, glulisine.
8.History of malignancy or malignancy.
9.Judged to be unsuitable for participation for medical reasons.

Target sample size

30


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yuji Kawaguchi

Organization

Minamiosaka Hospital

Division name

Internal medicine

Zip code


Address

1-18-18,higashikagaya,suminoe-ku,Osaka,559-0012,Japan

TEL

06-6685-0221

Email

y.kawaguchi@minamiosaka.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Yuji Kawaguchi

Organization

Minamiosaka Hospital

Division name

Internal medicine

Zip code


Address

1-18-18,higashikagaya,suminoe-ku,

TEL

06-6685-0221

Homepage URL


Email

y.kawaguchi@minamiosaka.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Minamiosaka Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

none

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2018 Year 01 Month 29 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2016 Year 05 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2016 Year 06 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2016 Year 11 Month 24 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2017 Year 02 Month 02 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2017 Year 10 Month 01 Day

Date analysis concluded

2017 Year 11 Month 13 Day


Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2018 Year 01 Month 29 Day

Last modified on

2019 Year 02 Month 10 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000035437


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name