UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000031891
Receipt number R000036408
Scientific Title Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials
Date of disclosure of the study information 2018/03/25
Last modified on 2023/01/19 14:22:35

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Acronym

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Scientific Title

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Scientific Title:Acronym

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Cancer patients prescribing opioids

Classification by specialty

Medicine in general Gastroenterology Hepato-biliary-pancreatic medicine
Cardiology Pneumology Endocrinology and Metabolism
Hematology and clinical oncology Nephrology Neurology
Clinical immunology Psychosomatic Internal Medicine Infectious disease
Geriatrics Surgery in general Gastrointestinal surgery
Hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Vascular surgery Chest surgery
Endocrine surgery Breast surgery Obstetrics and Gynecology
Dermatology Oto-rhino-laryngology Orthopedics
Urology Radiology Anesthesiology
Oral surgery Neurosurgery Cardiovascular surgery
Plastic surgery Emergency medicine Intensive care medicine
Rehabilitation medicine Dental medicine Nursing
Adult

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

We will compare the effect against quality of life (QOL) between conventional treatment (magnesium oxide) and naldemedine on the prevention of opioid-induced constipation with cancer patients .

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Exploratory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Phase III


Assessment

Primary outcomes

PAC-QOL overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.

Key secondary outcomes

1,PAC-SYM overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
2,CSS overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
3,Difference in the presence or absence of constipation by Rome IV (all observation period) after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
4,Bristol scale overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
5,SMBs overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.

6,PAC-QOL overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
7,PAC-SYM overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
8,CSS overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
9,Difference in the presence or absence of constipation by Rome IV (all observation period) after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
10,Bristol scale overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.
11,SMBs overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.

12,Oral compliance rate


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Parallel

Randomization

Randomized

Randomization unit

Individual

Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Active

Stratification

YES

Dynamic allocation

NO

Institution consideration

Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.

Blocking

YES

Concealment

Central registration


Intervention

No. of arms

2

Purpose of intervention

Prevention

Type of intervention

Medicine

Interventions/Control_1

Magnesium oxide

Interventions/Control_2

Naldemedine

Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

85 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1,Patients aged 20 to 85 years of age at the time of acquisition.
2,Gender, hospitalization / outpatient: no question
3,Patients who are not undergoing opioid analgesic treatment
4,Patients scheduled to use opioids due to cancer pain
5,Patients who can take oral medicine, meals and drinks
6,Patient who can be evaluated by patient diary (Surrogate record to patient's diary is permitted only when patient's own evaluation is possible)
7,Patients who are expected to have stable cancer pathology during the observation period
8,Patient who got written consent from participants to participate in this research, observe observance matter participating in this research, undergo examination prescribed in this research plan, and can declare symptoms etc.

Key exclusion criteria

1,Patients who are contraindicated in the package inserts of magnesium oxide and naldemedine and patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to the components of this drug.
2,Serious structural abnormalities of the digestive tract (eg mechanical ileus), diseases affecting intestinal transport (eg paralytic ileus, peritoneal dissemination affecting gastrointestinal function, peritoneal cancer, uncontrolled thyroid function decline (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (eg ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), active diverticular disease, pelvic disorders causing constipation (uterine prolapse, rectal prolapse, defecation A patient with uterine fibroids affecting). Also, even if these diseases are cured at present, patients judged by doctors to affect digestive tract function
3,Patient who is breastfeeding or may be pregnant.
4,Patients who underwent surgery that affects gastrointestinal function, treatment (eg nerve block) or radiotherapy affecting gastrointestinal function within 28 days from the date of registration or patients scheduled to be performed during the observation period

Target sample size

120


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Takaomi
Middle name
Last name Kessoku

Organization

Yokohama city university hospotal

Division name

Palliative care

Zip code

236-0004

Address

3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku

TEL

0457872640

Email

takaomi0027@gmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Takaomi
Middle name
Last name Kessoku

Organization

Yokohama city university hospotal

Division name

Palliative care

Zip code

236-0004

Address

3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa

TEL

0457872640

Homepage URL


Email

takaomi0027@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Yokohama city university hospotal

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Self funding

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization

Japan


Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Yokohama city university hospotal

Address

3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa

Tel

0457872640

Email

takaomi0027@gmail.com


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2018 Year 03 Month 25 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

None

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

None

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

100

Results

Nardimedine administered concurrently with opioid administration was significantly less worsening of JPAC-QOL compared to magnesium oxide administration.

Results date posted

2023 Year 01 Month 19 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Cancer patients requiring oral opioids

Participant flow

Pragmatic

Adverse events

The magnesium oxide group had higher nausea.

Outcome measures

Nardimedine administered concurrently with opioid administration was significantly less worsening of JPAC-QOL compared to magnesium oxide administration.

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2017 Year 11 Month 26 Day

Date of IRB

2018 Year 03 Month 22 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 03 Month 26 Day

Last follow-up date

2019 Year 06 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2018 Year 03 Month 25 Day

Last modified on

2023 Year 01 Month 19 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036408


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name