UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000032045
Receipt number R000036562
Scientific Title Questionnaire Survey on the Use of Depot Formulation of Leuprorelin Acetate Injection in Patients with Prostate Cancer (QLIPP)
Date of disclosure of the study information 2018/04/01
Last modified on 2020/10/02 09:33:28

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Questionnaire Survey on the Use of Depot Formulation of Leuprorelin Acetate Injection in Patients with Prostate Cancer (QLIPP)

Acronym

Questionnaire Survey on Leuprorelin use in prostate cancer patients

Scientific Title

Questionnaire Survey on the Use of Depot Formulation of Leuprorelin Acetate Injection in Patients with Prostate Cancer (QLIPP)

Scientific Title:Acronym

Questionnaire Survey on Leuprorelin use in prostate cancer patients

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

prostate cancer

Classification by specialty

Urology

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To consider preferences of prostate cancer patients and their caregivers, amongst 4 week depot (one-month depot formulation), 12 week depot formulation (three-month depot formulation), and six-month depot formulation

Basic objectives2

Others

Basic objectives -Others

Patient reported outcomes on treatment preference

Trial characteristics_1

Others

Trial characteristics_2

Others

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

To consider preferences of prostate cancer patients prescribed six-month depot formulation of Leuprorelin acetate injection and their caregivers, amongst 4 week depot (one-month depot formulation), 12 week depot formulation (three-month depot formulation), and six-month depot formulation, focusing on the following groups.
- Patients who have difficulty visiting hospitals
- Patients with high caregiver burden
- Patients who change planned hospital visits frequently
- Patients with multiple comorbidities at start of treatment

Key secondary outcomes

To add consideration on the relationship between patient preference of six-month depot formulations and the following factors: reduction of the frequency of painful injections, reduction of annual medical expenses for prostate cancer treatment, reduction of the frequency of hospital visits, reduction of the burden of the caregiver, reduction of the frequency of consultations with the doctor, reduction of the time of stay at the hospital, improvement of the quality of life.
To consider burdens of caregivers and preference of six-month depot formulations.


Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male

Key inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all of the inclusion criteria from 1 to 4 below and caregivers must meet the inclusion criterion 5 in order to be eligible to participate in the study.
1. Prostate cancer outpatients who have visited Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital Urology Department more than once
2. Prescribed six-month depot formulation
3. Agree to participate in the study
4. Eligible to read, understand, and answer the questionnaire for patients
5. Caregiver of patient who meet the inclusion criteria above who agree to participate in the study

Key exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have never prescribed luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist/LH-RH antagonist luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist/LH-RH antagonist
2. Caregivers of patients who cannot agree to participate in the study
3. Investigators, near relatives of investigators, investigator assistant, or near relatives of investigator assistant.
4. Who were judged clinically that responses to the questionnaire are improper or unsuitable by the principal investigator or collaborating physicians.
5. Who reject the participation of the study
6. Who wish to withdraw after the consent
7. When a false entry is identified

Target sample size

200


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Akira Yano, M.D., Ph.D.

Organization

Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital

Division name

Department of Urology

Zip code


Address

1 Bankyo-chi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8524, Japan

TEL

089-924-1111

Email

laparone@gmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Akira Yano, M.D., Ph.D.

Organization

Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital

Division name

Department of Urology

Zip code


Address

1 Bankyo-chi, Matsuyama, Ehime 790-8524, Japan

TEL

089-924-1111

Homepage URL


Email

laparone@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Limited

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Profit organization

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

松山赤十字病院(愛媛県)


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2018 Year 04 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

None

Publication of results

Published


Result

URL related to results and publications

http://www.pieronline.jp/content/article/0289-8020/41080/653

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

127

Results

Fifty-seven percent of patients and 65% of caregivers showed a strong preference for the 6M formulation compared with the 3M formulation. There was no difference in the percentage of strong preference between the two groups,
Among caregivers, there was a strong preference for the 6M drug in those who had to accompany their patients to the hospital (p<0.001). T

Results date posted

2020 Year 10 Month 02 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results

2020 Year 08 Month 20 Day

Baseline Characteristics

Prostate cancer patients and their caregivers being treated with 6M depot injections of leuprorelin acetate

Participant flow

Recruited and IC by a doctor on outpatient visit

Adverse events

None

Outcome measures

Clinical and patient reported outcomes

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2018 Year 02 Month 23 Day

Date of IRB

2018 Year 02 Month 23 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 04 Month 03 Day

Last follow-up date

2018 Year 08 Month 07 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2018 Year 08 Month 31 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2018 Year 09 Month 04 Day

Date analysis concluded

2018 Year 11 Month 30 Day


Other

Other related information

Questionnaire survey on preference of prostate cancer patients and their caregivers, amongst 4 week depot (one-month depot formulation), 12 week depot formulation (three-month depot formulation), and six-month depot formulation


Management information

Registered date

2018 Year 04 Month 01 Day

Last modified on

2020 Year 10 Month 02 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000036562


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name