Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000033518 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000037412 |
Scientific Title | Effects of tongue elevation training with hanging scale for healthy individuals |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/08/02 |
Last modified on | 2020/12/05 19:19:58 |
Effects of tongue elevation training with hanging scale for healthy individuals
Effects of tongue elevation training with hanging scale for healthy individuals
Effects of tongue elevation training with hanging scale for healthy individuals
Effects of tongue elevation training with hanging scale for healthy individuals
Japan |
Healthy adults
Rehabilitation medicine | Adult |
Others
NO
To examine the effect of tongue elevation training with hanging scale on oral function and swallowing function for healthy individuals
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Phase I
Maximum Traction force
1.Maximum tongue pressure value measured by JMS tongue pressure device
2.The tongue pressure value during the water effort swallowing measured by Swallowscan
3.Acoustic analysis of Oral Diadochokinesis
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Single blind -participants are blinded
No treatment
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
YES
Pseudo-randomization
2
Treatment
Device,equipment |
The gauze is fixed on the hanging scale. Participants are instructed to keep the gauze inserted in the oral cavity in contact with the tongue and palate. The gaze is directed horizontally, and the gauze is driven downward from the horizontal plane by 30 degrees. The training strength is 80% of the maximum traction force, and traing is performed for five seconds, 10 times per set, one set per day, three days a week, and seven weeks.
No training
20 | years-old | <= |
45 | years-old | >= |
Male and Female
In the past, there are no subjective or objective problems concerning oral motor function, speech and swallowing.
Participants are excluded with following criteria.
Organic defect in the palate, tongue and mandibular. History of diseases that may affect oral motor function, speech, and swallowing, such as strokes. Difficulties of following the traing instructions by advanced dementia, higher brain dysfunction and aphasia. Gingival retraction with periodontal disease in the upper and lower incisor teeth, lateral incisor, and canines. Mucosal flame in the palate or tongue.
30
1st name | Kazuhisa |
Middle name | |
Last name | Domen |
Hyogo collage of medicine
Department of rehabilitation
6638501
1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
0798-45-6644
office@craseed.org
1st name | Kohei |
Middle name | |
Last name | Horikawa |
Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation
6638501
1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
0798-45-6345
ko-horikawa@hyo-med.ac.jp
Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
Japanese Association of Speech-Language-Hearing Therapists
Other
Center for Clinical Research and Education
1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
0798-45-6006
chiken02@hyo-med.ac.jp
NO
兵庫医科大学病院(兵庫県)
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 02 | Day |
https://webview.isho.jp/journal/toc/13495828/17/3
Published
https://webview.isho.jp/journal/toc/13495828/17/3
27
Twenty-seven of the 30 subjects completed the training, and there were no adverse events due to this training. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of attributes and all endpoints. No significant difference was observed in all the endpoints in the control group. On the other hand, in the intervention group, significant increases were observed in maximum retention, maximum tongue pressure, Ch.1,2,4,5 tongue pressure.
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 05 | Day |
30 healthy young people (24 males and 6 females) under the age of 40 who did not find any subjective abnormalities in oral movement, articulation, or swallowing and consented to participate in the study. , Average age 26.4 years).
The study design adopted a quasi-randomized controlled trial. The group that received tongue-palatal contact training was the intervention group, and the group that did not receive it was the control group, and they were assigned to two groups by the envelope method. Stratification randomization was performed to evenly distribute the number of men and women in each group. After allocation, both groups underwent initial evaluation, the intervention group underwent final evaluation after training, and the control group underwent final evaluation 8 weeks after initial evaluation without training.
None
1) Maximal holding power
2) Maximal tongue pressure
3) Tongue pressure during swallowing
4) The number of oral diadochokinesis
Completed
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 02 | Day |
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 16 | Day |
2018 | Year | 08 | Month | 02 | Day |
2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 04 | Month | 30 | Day |
2018 | Year | 07 | Month | 26 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 05 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037412
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |