Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000033079 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000037723 |
Scientific Title | Exploring possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy beyond the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies): a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological study |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/06/22 |
Last modified on | 2018/06/21 15:49:00 |
Exploring possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy beyond the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies): a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
Exploring possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy:study protocol
Exploring possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy beyond the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies): a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
Exploring possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy:study protocol
Japan |
Systematic reviews
Not applicable |
Others
NO
The purpose of our study is to explore possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) beyond the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool.
Others
To investigate the impact of study characteristics in DTA
Study characteristics to be estimated will include publication year (before 2003 or after 2004), impact factor of publication journal, country (high or middle/low income), type of language (English or not), sample size, healthcare setting (primary healthcare or not), funding source (industrial sponsorship or not), publication status (full-publication or not), and number of study centers (single center or multicenter).
Others,meta-analysis etc
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
We will include systematic reviews (SRs) in which the authors evaluate the DTA of one or more tests against a reference standard. We will only include DTA reviews with meta-analyses that include 10 or more primary studies and provide data to reconstruct 2*2 tables.
We will exclude narrative reviews, genomic reviews, animal reviews, reviews that apply a language or quality restriction, reviews that assess the analytical validity of tests, and reviews that only evaluate other measures of diagnostic performance such as reproducibility and reliability.
70
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Akira Onishi |
Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology
7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe
81-78-382-6207
aonishi@med.kobe-u.ac.jp
1st name | |
Middle name | |
Last name | Akira Onishi |
Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology
7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe
81-78-382-6207
aonishi@med.kobe-u.ac.jp
Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
self funding
Self funding
NO
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 22 | Day |
Unpublished
Preinitiation
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 20 | Day |
2018 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
This is the first study to explore possible sources of bias in diagnostic test accuracy studies beyond the QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) tool.
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 21 | Day |
2018 | Year | 06 | Month | 21 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037723
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |