UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000033646
Receipt number R000038364
Scientific Title USEFULNESS OF IMAGE ENHANCED ENDOSCOPY FOR RECOGNITION OF EARLY GASTRIC CANCER AND ADENOMA
Date of disclosure of the study information 2018/08/06
Last modified on 2018/12/30 12:15:12

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

USEFULNESS OF IMAGE ENHANCED ENDOSCOPY FOR RECOGNITION OF EARLY GASTRIC CANCER AND ADENOMA

Acronym

COMPARING IEE FOR RECOGNITION OF EARLY GASTRIC TUMOR

Scientific Title

USEFULNESS OF IMAGE ENHANCED ENDOSCOPY FOR RECOGNITION OF EARLY GASTRIC CANCER AND ADENOMA

Scientific Title:Acronym

COMPARING IEE FOR RECOGNITION OF EARLY GASTRIC TUMOR

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Early gastric cancer and gastric adenoma

Classification by specialty

Gastroenterology

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of LCI for recognition of early gastric cancer and adenoma compared to conventional white light imaging mode (WLI), WLI with indigo carmine contrast (IC) and blue laser imaging bright mode (BLI-brt).

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

Recognition score that performed by three endoscopists and the L*a*b* color space-based color difference scores between inside and outside of the lesion.

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

90 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Patients who were examined by all four imaging (WLI, IC, BLI-brt and LCI) before endoscopic submucosal dissection at Asahi University Hospital.

Key exclusion criteria

Cases that principal investigator has determined to be inappropriate for this study.

Target sample size

90


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Nobuaki Yagi

Organization

Asahi University Hospital

Division name

Department of Gastroenterology

Zip code


Address

3-23, Hashimoto-cho, Gifu

TEL

+81-58-253-8001

Email

nyagi@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name Takeshi Yasuda

Organization

Asahi University Hospital

Division name

Department of Gastroenterology

Zip code


Address

3-23, Hashimoto-cho, Gifu

TEL

+81-58-253-8001

Homepage URL


Email

t-yasuda@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Asahi University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Asahi University

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

朝日大学病院


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2018 Year 08 Month 06 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results

The overall mean RS of LCI was significantly higher than that of WLI,IC,BLI-brt.
The overall mean CDS of LCI was significantly higher than that of WLI,IC,BLI-brt.
Subgroup analysis based on tumor type revealed that both RS and CDS of LCI for type 0-IIb or 0-IIc lesions (63 lesions) were significantly higher (p<0.01) than those of WLI, IC,BLI-brt.
On the other hand, regarding type 0-IIa lesions or adenomas the overall mean RS of LCI, as well as IC was significantly higher (p<0.01) than that of WLI,BLI-brt. The overall mean CDS of LCI, as well as IC and BLI-brt were significantly higher (p<0.01) than those of WLI.

Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2018 Year 07 Month 06 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 08 Month 06 Day

Last follow-up date

2018 Year 12 Month 28 Day

Date of closure to data entry

2018 Year 12 Month 30 Day

Date trial data considered complete

2018 Year 12 Month 30 Day

Date analysis concluded

2019 Year 01 Month 31 Day


Other

Other related information

To evaluate the usefulness of LCI for recognition of early gastric cancer and adenoma compared to conventional WLI,IC and BLI-brt at Asahi University Hospital. Both subjective and objective evaluation methods were adopted to quantify the recognition of early gastric cancer and adenoma.


Management information

Registered date

2018 Year 08 Month 06 Day

Last modified on

2018 Year 12 Month 30 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000038364


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name