UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000034703
Receipt number R000039289
Scientific Title The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Date of disclosure of the study information 2018/10/30
Last modified on 2019/10/31 11:57:38

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acronym

The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients

Scientific Title

The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Scientific Title:Acronym

The efficacy and safety of acetaminophen with fever in intensive care units(ICU) patients

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

critically ill patients

Classification by specialty

Medicine in general Intensive care medicine

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

Fever is one of the most common symptoms regardless of outpatients or resident patients. When fever causes serious exhaustion for patients, antipyretic therapy using acetaminophen is commonly performed. There are several reports on the safety and effectiveness of antipyretic therapy with acetaminophen. However, it has been reported that administration of acetaminophen caused transient hypotension in about 50% of patients treated within intensive care unit (ICU). It has been reported that some treatment such as crystalloid infusion or increasing in vasopressor dose was necessary in about 30% of acetaminophen-induced hypotension. This supposes that administration of acetaminophen may affect the prognosis of severe ICU patients.
Paul Young et al recently reported that the number of ICU-free days to 28 day and 90-day mortality rate did not differ significantly between patients with suspected infection administered either acetaminophen or placebo. However, the influence of acetaminophen on hemodynamics has not studied in this trial. In the past report the trial itself has been discontinued because the early death has risen due to anti-pyretic therapy. It is necessary to do systematic review to disclose whether the administration of acetaminophen makes any influence on the patient's prognosis.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

mortality at day 28

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

16 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

85 years-old >

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

ICU patients

Key exclusion criteria

none

Target sample size

1000


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name
Middle name
Last name Tomonori Kasai

Organization

Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital

Division name

Department of general medicine

Zip code


Address

2-1-1, Higashitsukurimichi, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan

TEL

017-726-8299

Email

to_kasai@hotmail.com


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name
Middle name
Last name SHUNSUKE SOMA

Organization

Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital

Division name

Department of general medicine

Zip code


Address

2-1-1, Higashitsukurimichi, Aomori-shi, Aomori, Japan

TEL

017-726-8299

Homepage URL


Email

shuns0114@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

None

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization


Address


Tel


Email



Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2018 Year 10 Month 30 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2018 Year 10 Month 16 Day

Date of IRB

2018 Year 10 Month 20 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 10 Month 30 Day

Last follow-up date

2018 Year 11 Month 30 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

<primary outcome>
1.mortality at day 28
2.mortality at day 90
3.ICU-free days

<secondary outcome>
1.the incidence of hypotension after injection of acetaminophen
2.therapeutic intervention at hypotension
3.quality of life(when leaving ICU)

<subgroup analysis>
1.age(over 65 years),body(under body mass index 18)
2.dose of acetaminophen(over 1000 mg)

<sensibility analysis>
we perform the following sensibility analysis on primary outcome
1.Exclusion of non-double blind studies.
2.Exclusion of studies using imputed statistics.
3.Missing participants:
Best-best scenario: all missing patients in the two groups remain unchanged
Best-worst scenario: all missing patients in the intervention group remain unchanged and all missing patients in the control group have outcomes
Worst-best scenario: all missing patients in the intervention group have outcomes and all missing patients in the control group remain unchanged
*primary analysis(worst-worst scenario: all missing patients in the two groups have outcomes)


Management information

Registered date

2018 Year 10 Month 30 Day

Last modified on

2019 Year 10 Month 31 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000039289


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name