Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000034960 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000039864 |
Scientific Title | Investigation of the influence of analgesic medication during surgery on postoperative pain |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2018/11/26 |
Last modified on | 2023/12/02 13:00:30 |
Investigation of the influence of analgesic medication during surgery on postoperative pain
Analgesic medication and postoperative pain
Investigation of the influence of analgesic medication during surgery on postoperative pain
Analgesic medication and postoperative pain
Japan |
General anesthetic patient
Anesthesiology |
Others
NO
Evaluate whether opioid administered during surgery causes postoperative hyperalgesia.
Efficacy
Exploratory
Explanatory
Not applicable
Postoperative hyperalgesia, pressure pain threshold
Postoperative Pain, Numeric rating scale
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -but assessor(s) are blinded
Dose comparison
2
Treatment
Medicine |
moderate dose of opioid administration during operation
low dose of opioid administration during operation
20 | years-old | <= |
60 | years-old | > |
Female
Benign Gynecological Disease
Severe systemic disease
Chronic opioid use
30
1st name | Tomohiko |
Middle name | |
Last name | Aoe |
Teikyo University
Chiba Medical Center, Pain Center
299-0111
3426-3 Anesaki, Ichihara City, Chiba 299-0111, Japan
0436-62-1211
tomohikoA@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp
1st name | Tomohiko |
Middle name | |
Last name | Aoe |
Teikyo University
Chiba Medical Center, Pain Center
299-0111
3426-3 Anesaki, Ichihara City, Chiba 299-0111, Japan
0436-62-1211
tomohikoA@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp
Teikyo University
Teikyo University
Other
Teikyo University Ethical Review Board for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects
2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo 173-8605, Japan
+81-3-3964-7256
turb-office@teikyo-u.ac.jp
YES
18-074
Teikyo University Ethical Review Board for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects
帝京大学ちば総合医療センター (Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center)
2018 | Year | 11 | Month | 26 | Day |
https://researchmap.jp/multidatabases/multidatabase_contents/detail/289920/67aa3093ab73eefe0e26c01bb
Published
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/19/5587
30
The pressure pain threshold at 3 h postoperatively was 51.1% (95% CI: [44.4-57.8]) in group A and 56.6% [49.5-63.6] in group B, assuming a preoperative value of 100% (P = 0.298). There were no significant differences in pressure pain threshold and numeric rating scale scores between the groups after surgery. The pain threshold decreased significantly in both groups at 3 h postoperatively compared to preoperative values, and recovered at 24 h.
2023 | Year | 12 | Month | 02 | Day |
Female patients in their 20s to 50s with benign ovarian or uterine disease, who were scheduled for laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were eligible for participation in the study if they had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification scores of I (normal healthy patient) or II (with mild systemic disease). Patients were not eligible if they were pregnant or breastfeeding, had cognitive impairment with difficulties in pain evaluation, had any contraindications to use of the drugs included in the protocol, or had a history of chronic opioid use before surgery. There was no particular weight limit for the patient, but the smaller value between the actual body weight and the ideal body weight, 22 x (height in m)2 kg, was used in this study to avoid drug overdose.
Patients were recruited until the planned number was achieved. During preoperative anesthesia consultation, an independent anesthesiologist evaluated the eligibility of applicants, obtained informed consent, and registered participants. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into either of the 2 groups by the permuted block method using the RAND function in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA); this was performed by the secretary under the supervision of an independent researcher. Sealed envelopes containing the group allocation and study number details were opened on the day of the operation. The patient and investigators who evaluated the pain intensity and threshold were blinded to group allocation. An independent anesthesiologist opened the sequentially numbered envelope containing details regarding randomization assignment, and administered general anesthesia according to the protocol.
No anesthesia-related adverse events were observed during and after surgery.
Primary outcome
Difference between the two groups in terms of the pressure pain threshold value at 3h
after the end of surgery, assuming that the value on the day before surgery was 100%.
Secondary outcomes
1. Difference between the two groups in terms of pressure pain threshold value at 24 h
after the end of operation.
2. Difference between the two groups in terms of numeric rating scale scores at 0-3 h, 3 h,
and 24 h after the end of operation.
Explorative outcomes
1. Difference between the two groups in terms of the frequency of analgesic (including
flurbiprofen, acetaminophen and pentazocine) use in the hospital room during 24 hours
after surgery.
2. Changes in postoperative pressure pain threshold and numeric rating scale score values
in each group compared to those before surgery.
Main results already published
2018 | Year | 10 | Month | 05 | Day |
2018 | Year | 10 | Month | 05 | Day |
2018 | Year | 11 | Month | 26 | Day |
2022 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2018 | Year | 11 | Month | 21 | Day |
2023 | Year | 12 | Month | 02 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000039864
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
2022/06/21 | study plan 18-074 English ed..pdf |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |