UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial
| Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000036088 |
|---|---|
| Receipt number | R000041114 |
| Scientific Title | Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
| Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/01/01 |
| Last modified on | 2022/05/23 11:25:23 |
* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments
Basic information
Public title
Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Acronym
Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation
Scientific Title
Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Scientific Title:Acronym
Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation
Region
| Japan |
Condition
Condition
Surgical patient with tracheal intubation
Classification by specialty
| Anesthesiology |
Classification by malignancy
Others
Genomic information
NO
Objectives
Narrative objectives1
To compare effectiveness between the Airtraq and the GlideScope for tracheal intubation in an adult population
Basic objectives2
Efficacy
Basic objectives -Others
Trial characteristics_1
Trial characteristics_2
Developmental phase
Assessment
Primary outcomes
Success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time, oral pharyngeal injury
Key secondary outcomes
Base
Study type
Others,meta-analysis etc
Study design
Basic design
Randomization
Randomization unit
Blinding
Control
Stratification
Dynamic allocation
Institution consideration
Blocking
Concealment
Intervention
No. of arms
Purpose of intervention
Type of intervention
Interventions/Control_1
Interventions/Control_2
Interventions/Control_3
Interventions/Control_4
Interventions/Control_5
Interventions/Control_6
Interventions/Control_7
Interventions/Control_8
Interventions/Control_9
Interventions/Control_10
Eligibility
Age-lower limit
| 18 | years-old | < |
Age-upper limit
| 100 | years-old | > |
Gender
Male and Female
Key inclusion criteria
Comparison between the Airtraq and the GlideScope in adults
Key exclusion criteria
We excluded trials involving manikins, tracheal intubation performed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the use of double-lumen tubes.
Target sample size
350
Research contact person
Name of lead principal investigator
| 1st name | Hiroshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hoshijima |
Organization
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Division name
Anesthesiology
Zip code
350-0495
Address
38 Morohongo, Moroyama-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
TEL
049-276-1271
hhoshi6@gmail.com
Public contact
Name of contact person
| 1st name | Hiroshi |
| Middle name | |
| Last name | Hoshijima |
Organization
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Division name
Anesthesiology
Zip code
350-0495
Address
38 Morohongo, Moroyama-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
TEL
049-276-1271
Homepage URL
hhoshi6@gmail.com
Sponsor or person
Institute
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Institute
Department
Personal name
Funding Source
Organization
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Organization
Division
Category of Funding Organization
Other
Nationality of Funding Organization
Other related organizations
Co-sponsor
Name of secondary funder(s)
IRB Contact (For public release)
Organization
Saitama Medical University Hospital
Address
38 Morohongo, Moroyama-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495, Japa
Tel
049492761271
hhoshi6@gmail.com
Secondary IDs
Secondary IDs
NO
Study ID_1
Org. issuing International ID_1
Study ID_2
Org. issuing International ID_2
IND to MHLW
Institutions
Institutions
Other administrative information
Date of disclosure of the study information
| 2020 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
Related information
URL releasing protocol
https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/icdr/ctr_reg_list.cgi
Publication of results
Unpublished
Result
URL related to results and publications
Submitting a treatise
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled
571
Results
From the electronic databases, we selected 8 trials comprising 571 patients for review. Compared with the GlideScope, Airtraq did not improve success rate, glottic visualization, or intubation time in tracheal intubation. TSA showed that total sample size did not reach the required information size for all parameters.
Results date posted
| 2021 | Year | 09 | Month | 05 | Day |
Results Delayed
Results Delay Reason
Date of the first journal publication of results
Baseline Characteristics
The inclusion criterion for studies was that each included study was either a prospective randomized control trials or a comparison between the Airtraq and the GlideScope in adults requiring tracheal intubation for a surgical procedure or for ventilation.
Participant flow
We independently assessed each of the two authors to determine if the extracted articles were suitable for our study selection. In addition, disagreements over the interpretation or analysis assignments of the data used in those extracted articles were resolved through discussion. If the results of a report may be duplicated and published, only the report that analyzes the latest data will be added to the meta-analysis. If we found missing or inconsistent data in the extracted articles, we contacted the author directly to retrieve the missing data and resolve the data inconsistencies.
Adverse events
none
Outcome measures
success rate (first attempt), glottic visualization (Cormack Lehane classification 1 vs 2 or higher), and intubation time.
Plan to share IPD
IPD sharing Plan description
Progress
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of protocol fixation
| 2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 04 | Day |
Date of IRB
| 2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 04 | Day |
Anticipated trial start date
| 2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 04 | Day |
Last follow-up date
| 2020 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
Date of closure to data entry
Date trial data considered complete
Date analysis concluded
Other
Other related information
We performed a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus databases
Management information
Registered date
| 2019 | Year | 03 | Month | 05 | Day |
Last modified on
| 2022 | Year | 05 | Month | 23 | Day |
Link to view the page
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041114
| Research Plan | |
|---|---|
| Registered date | File name |
| 2021/09/05 | UMIN報告書.docx |
| Research case data specifications | |
|---|---|
| Registered date | File name |
| 2021/09/05 | UMIN報告書-2.docx |
| Research case data | |
|---|---|
| Registered date | File name |
| 2021/09/05 | UMIN報告書-3.docx |
