UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000036346
Receipt number R000041175
Scientific Title Study on the influence of difference in joystick of mobility assist device on usability in healthy young, elderly and patients with central nervous system disorders.
Date of disclosure of the study information 2019/04/01
Last modified on 2022/07/08 09:03:47

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Study on the influence of difference in joystick of mobility assist device on usability in healthy young, elderly and patients with central nervous system disorders.

Acronym

Study on Joystick usability of mobility assist device.

Scientific Title

Study on the influence of difference in joystick of mobility assist device on usability in healthy young, elderly and patients with central nervous system disorders.

Scientific Title:Acronym

Study on Joystick usability of mobility assist device.

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Healthy young, elderly and patients with central nervous system disorders.

Classification by specialty

Rehabilitation medicine Adult

Classification by malignancy

Others

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

To test whether difference in usability depending on the difference of some joystick types in mobility assistive device.

Basic objectives2

Safety,Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2

Pragmatic

Developmental phase

Not applicable


Assessment

Primary outcomes

Subjective operability

Key secondary outcomes

Speed, Accuracy, Body function including finger dexterity, Cognitive function, Activities of daily living


Base

Study type

Interventional


Study design

Basic design

Single arm

Randomization

Non-randomized

Randomization unit


Blinding

Open -no one is blinded

Control

Uncontrolled

Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms

1

Purpose of intervention

Treatment

Type of intervention

Device,equipment

Interventions/Control_1

Participants uses some joysticks to drive on a predetermined course, and to reply ease of operation.

Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

90 years-old >=

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

1. The subjects who have given written informed consent by themselves.
2. The subjects who can sit independently.
3. The subjects who can transfer between a bed and a wheelchair.
4. The patients with supra-tentorial lesion.
5. The patients with hemiplegia.
6. The patients without apparent paralysis in the unaffected limbs.

Key exclusion criteria

1. The subjects whose general condition was poor.
2. The subjects having difficulties in understanding the study design, providing consent to, or participating in the study due to cognitive impairment, aphasia or dementia.
3. The subjects presenting severe joint deformation including degenerative deformity.
4. The subjects who are decided by a doctor or investigator as being inappropriate for entry into the present study.

Target sample size

60


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Eiichi
Middle name
Last name Saitoh

Organization

Fujita Health University, School of Medicine

Division name

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I

Zip code

470-1192

Address

1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

TEL

0562-93-2167

Email

rehabmed@fujita-hu.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Soichiro
Middle name
Last name Koyama

Organization

Fujita Health University, School of Health Sciences

Division name

Faculty of Rehabilitation

Zip code

470-1192

Address

1-98, Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan

TEL

0562-93-9000

Homepage URL


Email

koyamas@fujita-hu.ac.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Fujita Health University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Fujita Health University

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Self funding

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Institutional Review Board of Fujita Health University

Address

1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake-shi, Aichi

Tel

0562-93-2865

Email

f-irb@fujita-hu.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions

藤田医科大学(愛知県) Fujita Health University
藤田医科大学病院(愛知県)Fujita Health University Hospital


Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2019 Year 04 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol

https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041175

Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications

https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041175

Number of participants that the trial has enrolled

44

Results

Despite no significant differences in the primary outcome between joysticks, the I-shaped joystick with rounded tips (neutral grip) was ranked higher than the others. MT did not differ between joysticks, but DA was higher for the thin-columnar I-shaped joystick (pinch grip) than for the U- and T-shaped joysticks (pronated grip). MT and DA scores for young adults were significantly better than those for older adults. Further studies should be conducted to clarify possible factors related to EPW operability.

Results date posted

2022 Year 04 Month 06 Day

Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics

Forty-four healthy adults (22 young and 22 old).

Participant flow

All patients were enrolled.

Adverse events

No adverse events occurred in this study.

Outcome measures

Subjective ranking

Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of protocol fixation

2018 Year 02 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2018 Year 05 Month 15 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 10 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2021 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information



Management information

Registered date

2019 Year 03 Month 29 Day

Last modified on

2022 Year 07 Month 08 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041175


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name