Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000038276 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000043628 |
Scientific Title | Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test in the patients with influenza |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/01/01 |
Last modified on | 2022/10/13 04:00:47 |
Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test in the patients with influenza
Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test in the patients with influenza
Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test in the patients with influenza
Evaluation of rapid diagnostic test in the patients with influenza
Japan |
Influenza
Medicine in general | Pneumology | Infectious disease |
Others
NO
To evaluate novel rapid diagnostic test for influenza
Others
Detection rate
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
We calculated sensitivity, specificity, ROC curve, and AUC of novel rapid diagnostic test for influenza, and compared with antigen test.
Observational
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
Patient who have the symptom of influenza and are performed antigen test.
Patient who was administered anti-influenza agents within one month.
700
1st name | Katsunori |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yanagihara |
Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
Department of Laboratory Medicine
852-8501
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan
095-819-7200
k-yanagi@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
1st name | Norihito |
Middle name | |
Last name | Kaku |
Nagasaki University Hospital
Department of Laboratory Medicine
852-8501
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City, Nagasaki, Japan
095-819-7200
kaku-ngs@umin.ac.jp
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital
Tosoh Corporation
Profit organization
Nagasaki University Hospital
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki city, Nagasaki, Japan
095-819-7905
gaibushikin@ml.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
NO
2020 | Year | 01 | Month | 01 | Day |
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.03.22275936v3
Published
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.03.22275936v3
244
In nasopharyngeal swabs, based on the combined RT-PCR and sequencing results, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of TRC for influenza detection were 0.990, 1.000, 1.000, and 0.993, respectively. In the gargle samples, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the TRC for detecting influenza were 0.970, 0.982, 0.980, and 0.974, respectively.
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 13 | Day |
Patients with influenza-like illness
After obtaining informed consent, nasopharyngeal swabs and gargle samples were collected. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from all the patients using two swabs. Gargle samples were collected from patients whom the physician judged to be able to perform gargling.
None
Based on the combined RT-PCR and sequencing results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TRC for influenza detection were calculated.
Completed
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 10 | Day |
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
2021 | Year | 05 | Month | 31 | Day |
Observational study
2019 | Year | 10 | Month | 11 | Day |
2022 | Year | 10 | Month | 13 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000043628
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |