Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000038916 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000044371 |
Scientific Title | Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2019/12/17 |
Last modified on | 2019/12/17 19:12:28 |
Group-based education for advance directives and advance care planning
Group-based education for advance directives and advance care planning
Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan
Group-based educational intervention for advance care planning in primary care: a quasi-experimental study in Japan
Japan |
Non-cancer chronic diseases
Geriatrics |
Others
NO
To clarify whether a video-supported group-formatted advance care planning program for older primary care patients with stable medical conditions results in a better advance directive completion rate and a greater likelihood of familial discussions regarding advance care planning compared to an individual discussion with a physician
Efficacy
Confirmatory
Pragmatic
Not applicable
Advance directive completion
Familial discussion
Satisfaction with the discussion session
Perceptions and attitudes about advance care planning
Interventional
Parallel
Randomized
Individual
Open -no one is blinded
Active
NO
NO
Institution is not considered as adjustment factor.
NO
Pseudo-randomization
2
Educational,Counseling,Training
Other |
An educational video and brochure on advance care planning and advance directives were offered to all participants in the study. Then, participants in the intervention arm attended a 60-minute group discussion with other participants, which was facilitated by one of the study investigators. The group discussion addressed preferences about medical care at the end of life and the purpose of advance care planning. After the discussion, the participants were tracked for a period of time during which two regular visits to their attending physician were made. Their physicians allocated time for answering questions about the advance care planning if it was needed.
After watching the video, participants in the control arm engaged in a 20-minute individual discussion with their primary care physician on the same discussion topics. After the discussion, the follow-up visits were done in the same manner as those for participants in the intervention arm.
65 | years-old | <= |
100 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
Eligible participants were adult patients aged 65 years or older who regularly visited an assigned physician in the trial site for chronic illness care. They were required to have seen their physicians more than three times and to be legally competent.
Those who had already completed advance directives or living wills were ineligible for this study. Those who regularly visited another physician of any specialty were also excluded.
100
1st name | Shuji |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tsuda |
Kikugawa Family Medicine Center
Medical Department
437-1507
1055-1 Akatsuchi, Kikugawa, Shizuoka
0537-73-2267
syu-net@ba3.so-net.ne.jp
1st name | Shuji |
Middle name | |
Last name | Tsuda |
Kikugawa Family Medicine Center
Medical Department
437-1507
1055-1 Akatsuchi, Kikugawa, Shizuoka
0537-73-2267
syu-net@ba3.so-net.ne.jp
Kikugawa Family Medicine Center
None
Other
Ethics Committee of Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka
053-435-2680
rinri@hama-med.ac.jp
NO
菊川市家庭医療センター
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
https://www.hama-med.ac.jp/research/clinical-res/erc/index.html
Unpublished
https://jglobal.jst.go.jp/detail?JGLOBAL_ID=201402225778227537&rel=1#%7B%22category%22%3A%220%22%2C%
109
Advance directive completion rates were high for both group and individual arms but did not significantly differ between arms (85.7% vs. 80.4%, p=0.45). Only one-fifth of patients in both arms discussed advance care planning with their family after the intervention (20.7% and 21.7%, p=0.89). Patients in the group arm rated their experience slightly higher than those in the individual arm (4.2 and 3.9 out of 5, p=0.023).
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
Participants' mean age was 76.1 in the group arm and 78.8 in the individual arm. Most of them perceived their health status as good or excellent (88.8% and 73.9%, respectively). Only 11.5% and 13.0% of the participants in each arm were familiar with advance directives before the intervention.
A total of 133 eligible older adults were invited to participate. Of them, 109 agreed to participate, with 63 assigned to the group arm and 46 to the individual arm. After the allocation, three and two participants in the group and individual arms, respectively, did not attend the discussion session, and three and nine, respectively, did not complete the second questionnaire after engaging in their allocated discussion session.
None
Advance directive completion
Familial discussions
Satisfaction with the discussion sessions
Perceptions and attitudes about advance care planning
Completed
2013 | Year | 02 | Month | 01 | Day |
2013 | Year | 03 | Month | 29 | Day |
2013 | Year | 04 | Month | 01 | Day |
2014 | Year | 03 | Month | 31 | Day |
2014 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2014 | Year | 07 | Month | 31 | Day |
2014 | Year | 08 | Month | 31 | Day |
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
2019 | Year | 12 | Month | 17 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000044371
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |