![]() |
UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name: | UMIN ID: |
Recruitment status | No longer recruiting |
Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000040282 |
Receipt No. | R000045959 |
Scientific Title | Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2020/05/01 |
Last modified on | 2020/05/01 |
Basic information | ||
Public title | Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease | |
Acronym | Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease | |
Scientific Title | Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease | |
Scientific Title:Acronym | Health economics-based verification of functional myocardial ischemia evaluation of stable coronary artery disease | |
Region |
|
Condition | |||
Condition | stable coronary artery disease | ||
Classification by specialty |
|
||
Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
Genomic information | NO |
Objectives | |
Narrative objectives1 | To contribute to the appropriate elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), this study evaluate the health economics of testing and diagnosis for stable coronary artery disease (stable CAD) as long-term longitudinal study. |
Basic objectives2 | Others |
Basic objectives -Others | long-term clinical outcomes and cumulative public medical costs |
Trial characteristics_1 | Others |
Trial characteristics_2 | |
Developmental phase | Not applicable |
Assessment | |
Primary outcomes | The primary endpoint is cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). |
Key secondary outcomes | The secondary endpoints are major adverse coronary events (MACEs) or life years (LYs unit: year) and medical costs. CEA was the ratio of the related medical costs for over 36 months and LYs (US$/LY). |
Base | |
Study type | Others,meta-analysis etc |
Study design | |
Basic design | |
Randomization | |
Randomization unit | |
Blinding | |
Control | |
Stratification | |
Dynamic allocation | |
Institution consideration | |
Blocking | |
Concealment |
Intervention | |
No. of arms | |
Purpose of intervention | |
Type of intervention | |
Interventions/Control_1 | |
Interventions/Control_2 | |
Interventions/Control_3 | |
Interventions/Control_4 | |
Interventions/Control_5 | |
Interventions/Control_6 | |
Interventions/Control_7 | |
Interventions/Control_8 | |
Interventions/Control_9 | |
Interventions/Control_10 |
Eligibility | ||||
Age-lower limit |
|
|||
Age-upper limit |
|
|||
Gender | Male and Female | |||
Key inclusion criteria | This study identified a stable CAD in the subjects for analysis from the database using information including age when treatment was received, main disease (International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision: ICD-10), and treatment history. Out of ICD-10 code I11.0 through I50.9, eligibility criteria included patients with a disease code indicating stable CAD, adults aged 20 years or older, and patients undergoing testing or diagnosis related to the degree of anatomical coronary stenosis or functional ischemia severity for the first time: computed tomography angiography (CTA), stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), coronary angiography (CAG), or coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR). Subjects were followed up for at least 1 year (excluding cases of mortality). | |||
Key exclusion criteria | The exclusion criteria were as follows: prior coronary revascularization, history of ACS within 1 year before the index day, and any latent risk factors that could affect the evaluation of cardiac disease diagnosis and treatment, such as cardiac-related surgery, assisted circulation or arrhythmia device implantation. We also excluded cases thought to have a low risk of cardiac disease. These included patients undergoing CTA alone for whom stress electrocardiogram (ECG) or stress echocardiography had not been performed within 1 year before the index day, patients undergoing CAG alone who had undergone the same testing two or more times (excluding follow-up CAG), and patients not treated with anti-platelet agents within 6 months after CAG (excluding cases considered to have no coronary stenosis). Patients who underwent coronary revascularization within 5 days after the index day were excluded because they were considered to have a very high risk of coronary disease and/or to be high priority emergency cases. Patients with concurrent systemic diseases, including malignant tumors or Kawasaki disease (sequela), as well as general injuries, were excluded because these factors could affect prognosis and medical costs. | |||
Target sample size | 3500 |
Research contact person | |||||||
Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
Organization | The University of Tokyo | ||||||
Division name | Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, | ||||||
Zip code | 113-8655 | ||||||
Address | 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan | ||||||
TEL | +81-3-5800-9523 | ||||||
ttakura@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp |
Public contact | |||||||
Name of contact person |
|
||||||
Organization | The University of Tokyo | ||||||
Division name | Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, | ||||||
Zip code | 113-8655 | ||||||
Address | 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan | ||||||
TEL | +81-3-5800-9523 | ||||||
Homepage URL | http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/hehp/thebd.html | ||||||
acishea@gmail.com |
Sponsor | |
Institute | Department of Healthcare Economics and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo |
Institute | |
Department |
Funding Source | |
Organization | The University of Tokyo |
Organization | |
Division | |
Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
Nationality of Funding Organization |
Other related organizations | |
Co-sponsor | |
Name of secondary funder(s) |
IRB Contact (For public release) | |
Organization | Tokyo Hospital IRB |
Address | 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo |
Tel | 03-5841-0818 |
acishea@gmail.com |
Secondary IDs | |
Secondary IDs | NO |
Study ID_1 | |
Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
Study ID_2 | |
Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
IND to MHLW |
Institutions | |
Institutions | 東京大学附属病院 |
Other administrative information | |||||||
Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
Related information | |
URL releasing protocol | |
Publication of results | Unpublished |
Result | |
URL related to results and publications | |
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 3500 |
Results | |
Results date posted | |
Results Delayed | |
Results Delay Reason | |
Date of the first journal publication of results | |
Baseline Characteristics | |
Participant flow | |
Adverse events | |
Outcome measures | |
Plan to share IPD | |
IPD sharing Plan description |
Progress | |||||||
Recruitment status | No longer recruiting | ||||||
Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
Date of IRB |
|
||||||
Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
Date of closure to data entry | |||||||
Date trial data considered complete | |||||||
Date analysis concluded |
Other | |
Other related information | This retrospective cohort study used a large database obtained from the public medical insurance system of Japan. The data source comprised medical economic big data that mainly included medical service bills gathered from public insurers (health insurance societies of companies and so on) throughout Japan (TheBD). We examined the medical service received at hospitals, clinics, and pharmacies between April 2012 and March 2019 based on therapy performed (testing/diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, treatment/surgery, hospitalized recuperation, and so on), outcomes (death, hospital transfer, and so on), and medical costs and chronologically linked subjects with unified IDs.
An analysis of related testing combinations was performed after dividing subjects into groups depending on whether or not functional myocardial ischemia was evaluated and considering the degree of invasiveness. Specifically, we broadly divided subjects into the anatomical and functional evaluation groups and also categorized subjects according to whether they entered the catheterization laboratory. Subjects were divided into the following groups according to the modality: those who only underwent CTA, those who underwent only CAG or, in some cases, CAG and CTA, those who underwent only MPI or, in some cases, MPI and CTA, and a those who underwent either CAG and FFR or MPI and CAG. The bias related to patient backgrounds was reduced as much as possible using propensity score. For PS, we applied a multiple logistic regression analysis model using backward stepwise regression to predict dependent factors with functional ischemia evaluation being performed described as 1 and not being performed described as 0. To identify explanatory factors (covariance), we calculated PS for each case as sex, age/disease/pharmacotherapy/risk factors and matched the sample size with greedy matching. We then confirmed data distribution and balance for both groups (detailed testing of summary statistics per group). |
Management information | |||||||
Registered date |
|
||||||
Last modified on |
|
Link to view the page | |
URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045959 |
Research Plan | |
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
Registered date | File name |