UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000040922
Receipt number R000046727
Scientific Title Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy: An observational study (PROmRCC study)
Date of disclosure of the study information 2020/06/30
Last modified on 2023/03/21 09:56:22

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy: An observational study (PROmRCC study)

Acronym

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy: An observational study (PROmRCC study)

Scientific Title

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy: An observational study (PROmRCC study)

Scientific Title:Acronym

Health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy: An observational study (PROmRCC study)

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Renal cell carcinoma

Classification by specialty

Urology

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The objective was to assess whether first-line immunotherapy improved HRQoL in mRCC patients as well as the effect of irAEs on HRQoL of those patients.

Basic objectives2

Safety

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1


Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

The primary objective was to compare the HRQoL difference between the baseline and three months after treatment.

Key secondary outcomes

The secondary objective was to compare the HRQoL between patients with and without severe (grade 3 or higher) irAEs.

The exploratory objective was to compare the HRQoL between patients treated with immunotherapy as well as TKIs three months after treatment.


Base

Study type

Observational


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit

20 years-old <=

Age-upper limit

100 years-old >

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria was mRCC patients (1) who had the IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk disease, (2) who were able to answer QoL questionnaire, and (3) without active autoimmune disease.

Key exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria were mRCC patients (1) who had the IMDC favorable-risk disease, (2) who were not able to answer QoL questionnaire, and (3) who were not feasible for immunotherapy.

Target sample size

50


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Shingo
Middle name Hatakeyama
Last name Hatakeyama

Organization

Hirosaki University School of Medicine

Division name

Urology

Zip code

036-8562

Address

Hirosaki

TEL

0172395091

Email

shingoh@hirosaki-u.ac.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Shingo
Middle name
Last name Hatakeyama

Organization

Dept. of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine

Division name

Urology

Zip code

036-8562

Address

Hirosaki

TEL

0172395091

Homepage URL


Email

shingorilla2@gmail.com


Sponsor or person

Institute

Hirosaki University School of Medicine

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Hirosaki University School of Medicine

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Other

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Hirosaki University School of Medicine

Address

Hirosaki

Tel

0172395091

Email

rinri@hirosaki-u.ac.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2020 Year 06 Month 30 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Enrolling by invitation

Date of protocol fixation

2016 Year 02 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB

2016 Year 02 Month 01 Day

Anticipated trial start date

2018 Year 09 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2025 Year 03 Month 31 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

This multicenter observational study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hirosaki University School of Medicine.
HRQoL was assessed under the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 instruments. Analyzed HRQoL items included functioning summary QoL (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom summary QoL (nausea or vomiting, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, pain, or fatigue, dyspnea, and sleep), and global QoL. Since the symptom summary QoL represents a higher value as the worse outcome, we used [100-symptom summary QoL] in some analyses to represent a higher value as a better outcome.


Management information

Registered date

2020 Year 06 Month 28 Day

Last modified on

2023 Year 03 Month 21 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046727


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name