Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000040950 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000046759 |
Scientific Title | Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Nurse- Administered Discharge Criteria using Aldrete Scoring System (ASS) versus Modified Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) in Sedation of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/06/30 |
Last modified on | 2022/12/31 09:31:05 |
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Nurse- Administered Discharge Criteria using Aldrete Scoring System (ASS) versus Modified Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) in Sedation of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Aldrete scoring study
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Nurse- Administered Discharge Criteria using Aldrete Scoring System (ASS) versus Modified Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System (MPADSS) in Sedation of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Aldrete scoring study
Japan |
Patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy under sedation with Midazolam
Gastroenterology |
Others
NO
To compare the safety and efficacy of Nurse-Administered Discharge Criteria using Aldrete scoring system with previous MPADSS in patients after sedation of gastrointestinal endoscopy
Safety
recovery time after sedation of gastrointestinal endoscopy
Interventional
Single arm
Non-randomized
Open -no one is blinded
Historical
1
Treatment
Behavior,custom |
questionnaire
20 | years-old | <= |
Not applicable |
Male and Female
1) Patients who consent to participate in this study
2) adult over 20 years old
1) patients planned endoscopic therapy
2) patients who received endoscopic treatment
3) patients who themselves do not understand the use of sedation
4) patients using anesthetic drug other than midazolam
5) patients with severe complications (heart failure, renal failure, liver failure, respiratory failure)
6) pregnancy or lactation patients
7) patients with history of allergy to midazolam
8) patients who did not obtain consent to participate in this study
180
1st name | Daisuke |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yamaguchi |
Ureshino Medical Center
Gastroenterology
843-0393
Shimojyukukou 4279-3, Ureshino city, Japan
0954-43-1120
daisukehawks@gmail.com
1st name | Daisuke |
Middle name | |
Last name | Yamaguchi |
Ureshino Medical Center
Gastroenterology
843-0393
Shimojyukukou 4279-3, Ureshino city, Japan
0954-43-1120
daisukehawks@gmail.com
Ureshino Medical Center
None
Other
Institutional Review Board of Ureshino Medical Center
Shimojyukukou 4279-3, Ureshino city, Japan
0954-43-1120
daisukehawks@gmail.com
NO
2021 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12876-022-02549-7
Published
https://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12876-022-02549-7
376
The proportion of patients who had a recovery time within 60 min after endoscopy was significantly higher in group A than that in group M (42.5% versus 25.0%; P < 0.01). The proportion of patients who required > 120 min of recovery time after endoscopy was significantly lower in group A than that in group M (0.0% versus 5.0%; P = 0.03). However, significantly more patients had drowsiness at discharge in group A compared with group M (19.1% versus 5.0%; P < 0.01).
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
The present study enrolled outpatients who underwent sedative endoscopy at the National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center from two prospective studies that analyzed the usefulness of MPADSS and the modified Aldrete score, respectively, as discharge standards. Outpatients > 20 years of age who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or endoscopic ultrasonography under sedation were candidates for the present study. Intravenous sedation was not generally used in patients allergic to midazolam or in pregnant or breastfeeding women, thus excluding these patients. Outpatients who underwent therapeutic endoscopy were also excluded from the present study.
We prospectively enrolled 376 outpatients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy under midazolam sedation; 181 outpatients were assessed regarding discharge after sedative endoscopy using the MPADSS (group M), and 195 patients were assessed by the modified Aldrete score (group A).
Propensity-score matching created 120 matched pairs.
Drowsiness was seen more frequently in patients in group A compared with group M as an adverse event before discharge (5.0% versus 19.1%, respectively; P < 0.01), whereas no other adverse event rates differed between the groups. In group M, one patient required hospitalization because of inadequate arousal after sedative endoscopy.
While drowsiness was the most frequent adverse event within 24 h in both groups, the rates of adverse events within 24 h of discharge were not significantly different between the two groups. Most of the adverse symptoms were mild and resolved within 24 h. However, three patients in group M and two patients in group A returned to the hospital within 24 h of discharge for further observation. One of these patients was admitted to the hospital at the patient's request.
The primary endpoint of the present study was the difference in the discharge time after sedative endoscopy between the two groups. The secondary endpoint was the difference in the adverse events rate before discharge, need for hospitalization, and adverse events within 24 h after discharge between the two groups.
Completed
2020 | Year | 06 | Month | 29 | Day |
2020 | Year | 05 | Month | 28 | Day |
2020 | Year | 07 | Month | 01 | Day |
2021 | Year | 06 | Month | 30 | Day |
2020 | Year | 06 | Month | 29 | Day |
2022 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046759
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |