Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000042918 |
---|---|
Receipt number | R000048846 |
Scientific Title | Prospective observational comparison study between endovascular treatment devices for femoropopliteal arterial disease |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/01/05 |
Last modified on | 2021/01/05 21:03:26 |
Prospective observational comparison study between endovascular treatment devices for femoropopliteal arterial disease
Toma-Code FP study
Prospective observational comparison study between endovascular treatment devices for femoropopliteal arterial disease
Toma-Code FP study
Japan |
Peripheral Arterial disease
Cardiology |
Others
NO
To confirm the noninferiority of the patency rate in the patients underwent endovascular treatment for superficial femoral artery with following 3 comparison study. Cohort A: noninferiority of drug coated balloon to drug eluting stent, Cohort B: noninferiority of interwoven nitinol stent to drug eluting stent, Cohort C: noninferiority of drug coated balloon to interwoven nitinol stent
Safety,Efficacy
composite outcomes of restenosis(defined as 20% or greater decrease in the ankle brachial index), clinical driven target lesion revascularization, or unplanned lower extremity major amputation at 12 months after interventions
all cause death, clinical driven target lesion revascularization, unplanned lower extremity major amputation, ankle brachial index, and peak systolic velocity ratio from duplex ultrasound at 6, 12, 24, 36 months after interventions
Observational
20 | years-old | <= |
90 | years-old | > |
Male and Female
1. Subjects has symptomatic peripheral arterial disease of Rutherford category 2-5
2. Subject has a de novo or restenotic lesion with severer than 70% stenosis documented angiographically and no prior stent in the target lesion
3. Target lesion is limited at superficial femoral artery and does not exceed the medial femoral epicondyle or popliteal artery
4. Patency of at least 1 infrapopliteal artery to the ankle in continuity with the native femoropopliteal artery
5. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment
1. Subjects who rejected to participate this study through Opt-out method applied by a poster
2. Life expectancy <12 months
3. Pregnancy, suspected pregnancy, or breastfeeding during study period
4. Presence of cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction within 1 month of procedure
5. Untreated external iliac artery inflow lesion
6. Acute occlusive intraluminal thrombosis of the proposed lesion
site.
7. Evidence of an aneurysm at the target lesion site
600
1st name | Daisuke |
Middle name | |
Last name | Ueshima |
Kameda Medical Center
Cardiology
296-8602
929 Higashi-cho Kamogawa City Chiba Japan
+81-4-7092-2211
daisuke_ueshima@yahoo.co.jp
1st name | Daisuke |
Middle name | |
Last name | Ueshima |
Kameda Medical Center
Cardiology
296-8602
929 Higashi-cho Kamogawa City Chiba Japan
+81-4-7092-2211
daisuke_ueshima@yahoo.co.jp
Kameda Medical Center
TOkyo taMA peripheral vascular intervention research COmraDE: Toma-code
Self funding
Kameda Medical Center clinical research review board
929 Higashi-cho Kamogawa City Chiba Japan
+81-4-7092-2211
clinical_research@kameda.jp
NO
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 05 | Day |
Unpublished
Open public recruiting
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 22 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 23 | Day |
2020 | Year | 12 | Month | 23 | Day |
2025 | Year | 12 | Month | 31 | Day |
Statistical analysis
This study predetermines to adjust baseline characteristics with propensity score matching, the following confound factors are used for calculating the propensity score; gender, age, body mass index, comorbidity(hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hemodialysis), Rutherford classification, disability scale(able to walk, chair-bound, or bedridden), smoking habit, ankle brachial pressure index, lesion length, reference diameter, stenosis or occlusion, Peripheral arterial calcium score (PACSS score), number of outflow below-the-knee arteries, Post balloon angioplasty dissections grade (NHLBI grade).
The data center performed propensity matching in each cohort when all 3 groups (DCB, DES, or INS group) include more than 160 patients (1 to 1 without replacement matching). The enrollment continues until all matched group have 158 patients.
This study uses PROBE (Prospective Randomised Open Blinded Endpoint) design.
Sample size
Sample size is based on an expected primary outcome (composite outcomes of restenosis; defined as 20% or greater decrease in the ankle brachial index, clinical driven target lesion revascularization, or unplanned lower extremity major amputation) rate at 12 months after interventions of 10% in the each group. Roughly 142 patients per group are required for an 80% power to demonstrate that the upper limit of the 95% CI for a treatment different is 10% or less (respecified non-inferiority margin for this primary outcome). This calculation is based on a one-sided non-inferiority test at 2.5% significant level. Allowing for a 10% dropout rate for the primary outcome during 12 months follow-up period, 158 patients are required. Considering exclusion through propensity score matching, we presumed about 600 patients should be totally included. When non-inferiority is confirmed, we perform superiority test.
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 05 | Day |
2021 | Year | 01 | Month | 05 | Day |
Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000048846
Research Plan | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
2021/07/21 | 20210701 SFA研究計画vol2.docx |
Research case data specifications | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
---|---|
Registered date | File name |