![]() |
UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Name: | UMIN ID: |
Recruitment status | Completed |
Unique ID issued by UMIN | UMIN000042960 |
Receipt No. | R000049044 |
Scientific Title | Comparative study of three different techniques to increase active and passive hamstring flexibility - a randomized controlled trial. |
Date of disclosure of the study information | 2021/01/10 |
Last modified on | 2021/01/10 |
Basic information | ||
Public title | Stretching exercises for Hamstring group of muscles. | |
Acronym | Stretching exercises. | |
Scientific Title | Comparative study of three different techniques to increase active and passive
hamstring flexibility - a randomized controlled trial. |
|
Scientific Title:Acronym | Comparative study for three stretching techniques - RCT. | |
Region |
|
Condition | |||
Condition | Hamstring tightness. | ||
Classification by specialty |
|
||
Classification by malignancy | Others | ||
Genomic information | NO |
Objectives | |
Narrative objectives1 | The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Static stretching, Cupping
therapy and Self Myofascial release, on active and passive flexibility of hamstring muscle group using AKE, PSLR and SRT. |
Basic objectives2 | Others |
Basic objectives -Others | Active versus passive comparison. |
Trial characteristics_1 | Confirmatory |
Trial characteristics_2 | |
Developmental phase | Not applicable |
Assessment | |
Primary outcomes | Active knee extension (AKE)
Passive straight leg raise test (PSLR) |
Key secondary outcomes | Sit and reach test (SRT) |
Base | |
Study type | Interventional |
Study design | |
Basic design | Parallel |
Randomization | Randomized |
Randomization unit | Individual |
Blinding | Open -no one is blinded |
Control | Active |
Stratification | NO |
Dynamic allocation | NO |
Institution consideration | Institution is not considered as adjustment factor. |
Blocking | NO |
Concealment | Numbered container method |
Intervention | ||
No. of arms | 3 | |
Purpose of intervention | Prevention | |
Type of intervention |
|
|
Interventions/Control_1 | Self-Myofascial release-The participant assumed a long sitting position on a firm and even surface by placing the
arms backward and loading body weight on the palms. A foam roller was placed under the hamstrings and slowly moved back and forth from the ischial tuberosity to the popliteus, by applying pressure for 4 minutes (2 min for each leg) for 3 days at the same time of day at 24 hour interval |
|
Interventions/Control_2 | Cupping therapy-The cupping technique involved the static cupping
application for 7 minutes. The cupping intervention was performed using JINKANG B242 Cupping set. The participant lie down in prone position, a thin layer of lotion was applied to the hamstring and cups are placed on the trigger point. The assigned intervention was applied bilaterally to all participants and they were asked to continue their normal weekly exercise or activity routine. Follow up measurement was taken after 1 week of intervention. |
|
Interventions/Control_3 | Static stretching -Participants were in supine lying position with tested leg in active knee extension test position,
therapist passively extend the knee until the participant feels the intolerable stretch. This procedure was repeated for 3 times with 30 sec hold and 10 seconds interval in between each stretch for consecutive 5 days and follow up was taken on 8 th day |
|
Interventions/Control_4 | ||
Interventions/Control_5 | ||
Interventions/Control_6 | ||
Interventions/Control_7 | ||
Interventions/Control_8 | ||
Interventions/Control_9 | ||
Interventions/Control_10 |
Eligibility | ||||
Age-lower limit |
|
|||
Age-upper limit |
|
|||
Gender | Male and Female | |||
Key inclusion criteria | BMI between 18.5-24.9, hamstring are tight and passive SLR range between 30-70, at
least 15-20 degree loss of knee extension when hip held in 90 degree flexion, participants with less than 12 inches in Sit and reach test and Stretch end feel during complete range of motion |
|||
Key exclusion criteria | past history of hamstring injury within 2 years, Low joint mobility or
hypermobility, Metabolic disease, Incomplete post fracture bone fusion, Lumbar and lower limb neurological compromise, Limb length discrepancy, Acute joint pain with exercise, Straight leg, hip flexion range of motion was greater than 70 degree. Ethical approval for this randomised study was granted by, NTCC committee of AIPT, AUUP, A+ orthopaedic and sports Med Centre. Informed consent was obtained from all participants and any relevant questions answered on data collection, all concerned were aware of the right to withdraw from the study at any time. |
|||
Target sample size | 45 |
Research contact person | |||||||
Name of lead principal investigator |
|
||||||
Organization | Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, UP | ||||||
Division name | Uttar Pradesh Noida | ||||||
Zip code | 201303 | ||||||
Address | F1 LGF Sector 125, Noida UP India | ||||||
TEL | 01204392000 | ||||||
mshukla@amity.edu |
Public contact | |||||||
Name of contact person |
|
||||||
Organization | Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, UP | ||||||
Division name | Uttar Pradesh Noida | ||||||
Zip code | 201303 | ||||||
Address | F1 LGF Sector 125, Noida UP India | ||||||
TEL | 911204392000 | ||||||
Homepage URL | https://www.amity.edy/aipt | ||||||
mshukla@amity.edu |
Sponsor | |
Institute | Amity Institute of Physiotherapy |
Institute | |
Department |
Funding Source | |
Organization | NA-Self |
Organization | |
Division | |
Category of Funding Organization | Self funding |
Nationality of Funding Organization | India |
Other related organizations | |
Co-sponsor | NA |
Name of secondary funder(s) | NA |
IRB Contact (For public release) | |
Organization | Amity Institute of Physiotherapy |
Address | F1 LGF, AIPT, AUUP, Noida, India, 201313 |
Tel | 0120-4392000 |
mshukla@amity.edu |
Secondary IDs | |
Secondary IDs | NO |
Study ID_1 | |
Org. issuing International ID_1 | |
Study ID_2 | |
Org. issuing International ID_2 | |
IND to MHLW |
Institutions | |
Institutions | Amity Institute of Physiotherapy
A+ Orthopaedic centre |
Other administrative information | |||||||
Date of disclosure of the study information |
|
Related information | |
URL releasing protocol | NA |
Publication of results | Unpublished |
Result | |||||||
URL related to results and publications | NA | ||||||
Number of participants that the trial has enrolled | 48 | ||||||
Results | result show different effects. Passive interventions affect passive flexibility. Active interventions increase active flexibility. | ||||||
Results date posted |
|
||||||
Results Delayed | |||||||
Results Delay Reason | na | ||||||
Date of the first journal publication of results | |||||||
Baseline Characteristics | Table 2 Showing mean and standard deviation of different groups with descriptive
parameters. To summarize, this table shows mean and standard deviation of various parameters like, age, height, weight and BMI of GROUP-1, GROUP-2 and GROUP-3. Mean age was 21.66 to 25.13 BMI was less than 24.9. |
||||||
Participant flow | N=60 assessed, 48 selected & randomized
15 excluded 45 randomized completed study |
||||||
Adverse events | NA | ||||||
Outcome measures | AKE
PSLR SRT |
||||||
Plan to share IPD | Publication is planned | ||||||
IPD sharing Plan description | Publication is planned |
Progress | |||||||
Recruitment status | Completed | ||||||
Date of protocol fixation |
|
||||||
Date of IRB |
|
||||||
Anticipated trial start date |
|
||||||
Last follow-up date |
|
||||||
Date of closure to data entry |
|
||||||
Date trial data considered complete |
|
||||||
Date analysis concluded |
|
Other | |
Other related information | The study was completed in the year 2020, and publication is planned in 2021. Results are not getting entered in the section given - One-way ANOVA in the follow-up analysis of three groups has shown a
significant variation in the AKE (p= 0.013*), and PSLR (p= 0.019*). In parallel analysis using unpaired t test - post intervention analysis , SRT has shown better result for SMFR versus SS (p = 0.018), AKE has shown better result for SS versus CTh (p=0.043), and PSLR has shown better result for CTh versus SMFR (p=0.02); followup analysis , SRT has shown better result for SMFR versus SS (p=0.04), and SMFR versus CTh (p=0.012), AKE has shown better results for SMFR versus SS (p= 0.045 ), and SMFR versus CTh (p=0.0035 ), PSLR has shown better results for CTh versus SMFR (p= 0.004), and SS versus SMFR (p= 0.025). |
Management information | |||||||
Registered date |
|
||||||
Last modified on |
|
Link to view the page | |
URL(English) | https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000049044 |
Research Plan | |
Registered date | File name |
Research case data specifications | |
Registered date | File name |
Research case data | |
Registered date | File name |