UMIN-ICDS Clinical Trial

Unique ID issued by UMIN UMIN000051701
Receipt number R000059005
Scientific Title Proximal humerus reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review
Date of disclosure of the study information 2023/08/01
Last modified on 2023/07/24 17:58:54

* This page includes information on clinical trials registered in UMIN clinical trial registed system.
* We don't aim to advertise certain products or treatments


Basic information

Public title

Proximal humerus reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

Acronym

Proximal humerus reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

Scientific Title

Proximal humerus reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

Scientific Title:Acronym

Proximal humerus reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: a single-arm meta-analysis and systematic review

Region

Japan


Condition

Condition

Bone tumor in proximal humerus

Classification by specialty

Orthopedics

Classification by malignancy

Malignancy

Genomic information

NO


Objectives

Narrative objectives1

The aim of our study was to analyze all-inclusively the functional results, reconstruction survival and complications of different reconstruction techniques based a meta-analysis and systematic review of objectively integrated and weighted data. 

Basic objectives2

Efficacy

Basic objectives -Others


Trial characteristics_1

Confirmatory

Trial characteristics_2


Developmental phase



Assessment

Primary outcomes

Funtional outcome of upper limbe; Prosthesis survival; complication

Key secondary outcomes



Base

Study type

Others,meta-analysis etc


Study design

Basic design


Randomization


Randomization unit


Blinding


Control


Stratification


Dynamic allocation


Institution consideration


Blocking


Concealment



Intervention

No. of arms


Purpose of intervention


Type of intervention


Interventions/Control_1


Interventions/Control_2


Interventions/Control_3


Interventions/Control_4


Interventions/Control_5


Interventions/Control_6


Interventions/Control_7


Interventions/Control_8


Interventions/Control_9


Interventions/Control_10



Eligibility

Age-lower limit


Not applicable

Age-upper limit


Not applicable

Gender

Male and Female

Key inclusion criteria

English-language articles on proximal humerus resection for malignant bone tumors with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Key exclusion criteria

We excluded case reports and case series with less than 4 patients, reconstruction methods only for benign or metastatic bone tumors, intercalary/distal humerus reconstruction, and reconstruction following fracture or osteomyelitis.

Target sample size

2000


Research contact person

Name of lead principal investigator

1st name Hisaki
Middle name
Last name Aiba

Organization

Nagoya City University

Division name

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Zip code

467-8501

Address

1, Azakawasumi, Mizuho-cho. Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

TEL

052-853-8236

Email

hisakiaiba@yahoo.co.jp


Public contact

Name of contact person

1st name Hisaki
Middle name
Last name Aiba

Organization

Nagoya City University

Division name

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Zip code

467-8601

Address

1, Azakawasumi, Mizuho-cho. Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

TEL

052-853-8236

Homepage URL


Email

hisakiaiba@yahoo.co.jp


Sponsor or person

Institute

Nagoya City University

Institute

Department

Personal name



Funding Source

Organization

Not applicable

Organization

Division

Category of Funding Organization

Local Government

Nationality of Funding Organization



Other related organizations

Co-sponsor


Name of secondary funder(s)



IRB Contact (For public release)

Organization

Not applicable

Address

Not applicable

Tel

052-853-8236

Email

hisakiaiba@yahoo.co.jp


Secondary IDs

Secondary IDs

NO

Study ID_1


Org. issuing International ID_1


Study ID_2


Org. issuing International ID_2


IND to MHLW



Institutions

Institutions



Other administrative information

Date of disclosure of the study information

2023 Year 08 Month 01 Day


Related information

URL releasing protocol


Publication of results

Unpublished


Result

URL related to results and publications


Number of participants that the trial has enrolled


Results


Results date posted


Results Delayed


Results Delay Reason


Date of the first journal publication of results


Baseline Characteristics


Participant flow


Adverse events


Outcome measures


Plan to share IPD


IPD sharing Plan description



Progress

Recruitment status

Preinitiation

Date of protocol fixation

2023 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Date of IRB


Anticipated trial start date

2023 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Last follow-up date

2023 Year 08 Month 01 Day

Date of closure to data entry


Date trial data considered complete


Date analysis concluded



Other

Other related information

Data collection
We collected the following from each study using a data collection sheet and separated into each group: (1) basic data (author name, year of publication, journal name, study type, investigation period, number of patients, patient age, and tumor histology) and the range of resection, categorized by Malawer et al17. or Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS).; (2) postoperative functional outcome assessed using the MSTS score; the reconstruction; and (4) complications, as categorized by Henderson et al.

Methodological quality assessment
0-4, very low quality; 5-8, low quality; 9-12, moderate quality; 13-16, high quality20. 19-24, high quality. Disagreements were resolved through discussion between the authors (H.A., A.A., and C.E.).

Statistical analyzes
We performed a single-arm meta-analysis of the data from the selected studies. A random-effects or fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled incidences of implant failure rate 5 years after surgery and MSTS score. Summary effect measures are presented with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. indicated insignificant, low, moderate, and high levels of heterogeneity, respectively21. A random-effects model was used if I2>50%; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. Statistical analyzes were performed using Review Manager version 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration 2014, The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). We calculated the standard deviation (SD) and standard error (SE) from the information in the articles or assumed these values from the range 22, and only data with SD or SE were included in the analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05 for all analyzes.


Management information

Registered date

2023 Year 07 Month 24 Day

Last modified on

2023 Year 07 Month 24 Day



Link to view the page

Value
https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/icdr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000059005


Research Plan
Registered date File name

Research case data specifications
Registered date File name

Research case data
Registered date File name